Today's Date
"I can’t tell you exactly what year it is because we honestly don’t know," said Morpheus in The Matrix. Well, may be we don't know what year it is today, but there clearly are some people out there, who know that we do not know. We have at least two such individuals:
Heck, may be they don't know that we do not know either. But in this case they know some individuals who told them that we do not know...

I have seen enough pieces to form a concept in my head, but putting it into words supported by relevant images... it's gonna take a few days. This is definitely not what I'd prefer to write about, but I can't ignore the observed.
  • Our Hungarian, Russian (and other European) readers might find the below article quite entertaining and disturbing.
For me, it all started with the below 1591 excerpt.
  • The surname of the imperial house of Russia is called Beala.
    • It took the origin from the Kings of Hungary.
  • Do you see any house of Beala in the official narrative?
  • Here is what we should have had in the below excerpt:
    • The surname of the imperial house of Russia is called Rurikids.
    • The Rurik line ruled from 862 until 1610.
KD: This Beala vs Rurikids issue appears to be a humongous historical red flag.
  • It's a teaser. Links are gonna be down below when we get to the issue.

Historical Lies
That said, I believe that the above "quoted" book is merely a reflection of the historical narrative they had in 1590s. Fortunately for us, it is much harder to lie when your contemporaries are still alive. In 1591, their current historical narrative could be altered only so much.
  • From this perspective, in 1591, they simply could not say "the Imperial house of Russia is called Rurikids", because at the time when the book was published, that simply was not the case.
  • On a separate note, even as far back as 1591 is supposed to be on the time line, they already did not really know their history, imho. We have some amazing research tools & resources at our fingertips these days. They did not.
We all have our opinions, and in my opinion, we live in a jar of historical lies labeled "TRUTH". Our society has been marinating in this jar for so long, that lies ended up becoming our reality. I doubt that the label will ever change.
Chronology #1
I do understand that there are those, who fundamentally disagree with Fomenko's findings. To disagree, one would have to verify his calculations, and point out where this Ph. D. in mathematics was wrong.
  • As it stands, according to Fomenko, Jesus was born in 1152 AD.
    • That would be 2021 - 1152 = 869 years ago.
  • I came to think, that Jesus was not a living being, but rather an event, from which we chose to count our years.
Here are additional reasons to consider that Jesus was an Event and not a Living Being:
May be further research into the Zodiac Circle could help us to determine what four major events were supposed to signify.
  • The conceiving of Jesus by Virgin Mary.
  • The birth of Jesus.
    • Sagittarius is a centaur, but the key aspect (imho) is the arrow (or spear), suggesting an attack.
      • ♐
    • Considering that the assumed year of his birth is between 6 and 4 BC, we should be asking questions in reference to the AD/BC split.
  • The death of Jesus.
    • Aries is Latin for "ram".
      • ♈
    • Wasn't Jesus the Lamb of God?
  • The Resurrection of Jesus.
    • How do we go from Aries (Sacrificial Lamb) to Pisces (Fishes) in 3 days.
      • I have no idea...
    • Pisces is the twelfth and final astrological sign in the Zodiac.
      • ♓
    • It spans 330° to 360° of celestial longitude.
The resurrection of Jesus, or anastasis, is the Christian belief that God raised Jesus on the third day after his crucifixion.
  • For the Christian tradition, the bodily resurrection was the restoration to life of a transformed body powered by spirit, as described by Paul and the Gospel authors, that led to the establishment of Christianity.
  • They conclude that Jesus was most likely crucified on April 3, AD 33.
Jesus vs. Fish
One way or another, but Jesus became associated with fish. There are a few theories out there on how this Jesus-Fish connection might have originated. The entire thing even got its own name: Ichthys.
  • The ichthys is a symbol consisting of two intersecting arcs, the ends of the right side extending beyond the meeting point so as to resemble the profile of a fish.
  • The symbol was adopted by early Christians as a secret symbol.
  • It is now known colloquially as the "sign of the fish" or the "Jesus fish".

This here is claimed to be one of the earliest circular ichthys symbols, created by combining the Greek letters ΙΧΘΥΣ.


We sure have an explanation, where every single letter in ΙΧΘΥΣ is explained. Somehow, I doubt that we get the intended meaning though.
  • How do we know that this is not some date from I, from IX or of/from "pisces"?
    • ... the numeric values of the letters are added together to obtain the total.​
    • For example, 241 was represented as ΣΜA (200 + 40 + 1).
    • It was not always the case that the numbers ran from highest to lowest: a 4th-century BC inscription at Athens placed the units to the left of the tens.
  • How do we know it's not some Bible verse?
  • What's up with the wheel? Could it be the Ezekiel's Wheel +1?
    • Who knows, may be the IX monogram is somehow related to this wheel...

Ichthyo is a combining form meaning “fish,” used in the formation of compound words. For example - ichthyology. For myself, I see an obscured reference to water, as in ... may be "we are all fish in the water"... just speculating.

I am Alpha and Omega
In the New Testament Book of Revelation, God says, “I am Alpha and Omega,” meaning that he is the beginning and end of all things. In the Greek alphabet, alpha is the first letter and omega is the last.
  • I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the ending, saith the Lord, which is, and which was, and which is to come, the Almighty.
  • Saying, I am Alpha and Omega, the first and the last: and, What thou seest, write in a book, and send it unto the seven churches which are in Asia; unto Ephesus, and unto Smyrna, and unto Pergamos, and unto Thyatira, and unto Sardis, and unto Philadelphia, and unto Laodicea.
  • And he said unto me, It is done. I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end. I will give unto him that is athirst of the fountain of the water of life freely.
  • I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end, the first and the last.

Well, May be Jesus was the beginning for some, but he sure was the end for others. I think what we have hiding behind this words is this:
  • Jesus Event = Apocalypse
The Bible
In my opinion, there are no predictions in the Bible, because it was written after certain events took place. The narrative can claim whatever they want to. Facts speak for themselves. The great uncial codices or four great uncials are the only remaining uncial codices that contain (or originally contained) the entire text of the Bible.
  • Codex Vaticanus– c. 325–350
    • The Codex is named after its place of conservation in the Vatican Library, where it has been kept since at least the 15th century.
  • Codex Sinaiticus– c. 330–360
    • discovered in 1844
  • Codex Alexandrinus– c. 400–440
    • It derives its name from Alexandria where it resided for a number of years.
    • Then it was given to Charles I of England in the 17th century.
  • Codex Ephraemi– c. 450
    • Go figure. My guess it was "discovered" some time in the 19th century.
When we take "dated" out of the equation, the oldest copy of the Bible text source is no older than generous 1400s. There are no prophets. There are those who know, and those who do not, imho.

Historical Sources
Reading between the lines of the existing historical lies is the best source of truth we have, imho. Just like I mentioned in the beginning of this article, it was harder to lie about some 1627 AD in 1627 AD than it is in 2021 AD. Seeking out details extracted from those 1627 AD lies could point us towards some of the (more or less) truthful facts.


Historical sources include documents, artifacts, archaeological sites, features, oral transmissions, stone inscriptions, paintings, recorded sounds, images (photographs, motion picture), and oral history. Even ancient relics and ruins, broadly speaking, are historical sources.
Those, who genuinely tried to figure out the sources of our alleged knowledge of the events of the past know that:
Manuscript Forgery
It appears that our historical narrative has a hidden, or rather unadvertised pandemic. The amount of made up documents is truly astounding. There is no possible way to determine where the lies end and the truth begins.

  • The Donation of Constantine is a forged Roman imperial decree by which the 4th-century emperor Constantine the Great supposedly transferred authority over Rome and the western part of the Roman Empire to the Pope. Composed probably in the 8th century, it was used, especially in the 13th century, in support of claims of political authority by the papacy. In many of the existing manuscripts (handwritten copies of the document), including the oldest one, the document bears the title Constitutum domini Constantini imperatoris.
  • William Henry Ireland (1775-1835) and John Payne Collier (1789-1883) are two of the most well-known forgers of early modern documents. While Ireland focused almost exclusively on Shakespeare forgeries, Collier was more broad-reaching in his fakes.
  • Forgery was rife in the medieval era, with some of Europe’s leading holy men cooking up reams of counterfeit documents. As modern scholars have established, over half of the surviving texts in the names of the Merovingian rulers of early medieval France and Germany (c481–752) are fakes; a third of those in the names of the Lombard rulers of northern Italy (568–774) are suspect; and similar figures hold true of the nearly 2,000 documents of pre-Conquest England.
  • A new book claims that England’s Gospels of St Augustine and Ireland’s Book of Kells, among other famous medieval manuscripts, are fakes.
  • The Spanish Forger is the name given to an unidentified individual who, in the late 19th to early 20th century, created a large number of forgeries of medieval miniatures. The Spanish Forger's works were painted on vellum or parchment leaves of genuine medieval books, using either blank margins or scraping off the original writing. He also "completed" unfinished miniatures or added missing miniatures in medieval choir books. His works fooled many experts and collectors at the time and appear today in the collections of many museums and libraries. Over 200 forgeries have been identified.
  • In April 2015, about year and a half before the Beyond Words exhibition opened, I contacted some of its organisers to suggest that the illuminated manuscript in which this miniature is found should perhaps not be included in the exhibition.
  • Margaret M. Mitchell of the University of Chicago, together with experts in micro-chemical analysis and medieval bookmaking, has concluded that one of the University Library's most enigmatic possessions is a forgery.
  • Forgeries tell us much about any civilization. Look at what people are forging, and we will learn what matters to them most. Christians of the early Middle Ages were earnestly counterfeiting relics of saints, to create tangible evidence of supernatural beliefs which they longed to validate. In twelfth-century Europe, people fabricated land charters, inventing documentation of title to feudal property on which livelihoods and society depended. In the sixteenth century, it was commonplace to concoct spurious ancestors, faking up complex family trees for the ambitious, in a time when social ranking was a necessity for advancement.
Additional links covering various historical forgeries.
KD: As you can see, they've been forging everything... what's real out there? Nothing?

Industrial Progress
It appears that in our PTB provided understanding of the "linear" progress of humanity, we forgot what a beast critical thinking was. In reality, to get us out of the proverbial "technological" darkness, we only needed two people, Tesla and Trouvé:
Considering that we were also given two industrial revolutions, it somehow ended up not being at all suspicious that it only took us 156 years to go from a hot air balloon to a turbojet powered aircraft.
Welcome to the BS: While our ancestors have been around for about six million years, the modern form of humans only evolved about 200,000 years ago. Civilization as we know it is only about 6,000 years old, and industrialization started in the earnest only in the 1800s.
  • In other words, for approximately 199,800 (99.9% of 200,000) years humans were idiots, while possessing the same brain.
    • Early Homo sapiens had brains within the range of people today, averaging 1,200 ml or more.
Chronology #2
If you want to learn all the BS about AD and BC, here is your link. For us, it's important to recognize that there is a split there indicating "before" and "after". "Before" is a totally separate topic I will touch up on later. "After", or Anno Domini, aka AD, is something we do need to cover:
  • The term anno Domini is Medieval Latin and means "in the year of the Lord", but is often presented using "our Lord" instead of "the Lord", taken from the full original phrase "anno Domini nostri Jesu Christi", which translates to "in the year of our Lord Jesus Christ".
  • Where is Jesus Christ hiding in "Anno Domini"?
Let's take a look at the Second Epistle of Peter 3:10:
  • But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night; in the which the heavens shall pass away with a great noise, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat, the earth also and the works that are therein shall be burned up.
  • KJV Source
Then we have these calculations performed by biblical scholars of the past.
  • Year 437 AD - the precise Year from whence the Lord of Times and Seasons thought good to date the beginning of his Times, or Reign.
Questions: Is the "Year of the Lord" and "Anno Domini" even the same thing?
  • Judgement by fire is indicative of the Apocalypse times.
  • If this is when the "Day of the Lord" comes, and we count from the "Year of the Lord", wouldn't it mean that the Apocalypse has already happened?

My Understanding of the Time Line
I do not see how we can figure out what year we live in. The entire BC/AD split appears to be highly questionable by now. The mere fact that our ancestors, for whatever reason, decided to count their years from a certain "Jesus Birth Event" (that allegedly happened four to six years prior to the BC/AD split) sounds somewhat suspicions. Unfortunately, we are way too used to this "Anno Domini" by now.
  • Here is my vision of the time line.
  • I do not insist on the specific dates. At the same time, in order to put things on a time line, we do need chronological points of reference.

Considering that the most powerful ruler of the Hunnic Empire was Attila the Hun, it only makes sense to start with the country of Hungary. Today it's a tiny landlocked country in Central Europe. Some will argue that Attila the Hun had anything to do with Hungary as a country:
  • Attila was Hun, not Hungarian. Only the English name of the magyarok (the Hungarians) make this notion sound plausible, but in fact Attila lived earlier in present day Hungary before the arrival the Hungarians to the Carpathian basin.
  • Source
The issue appears to be way more sophisticated, and it just may be, that Attila the Hun ended up influencing many countries, Hungary included.


Tobolsk is a town in Russia, located at the confluence of the Tobol and Irtysh rivers. Founded in 1590, Tobolsk is the second-oldest Russian settlement east of the Ural Mountains in Asian Russia, and is a historic capital of the Siberia region.

Why are we talking about the city of Tobolsk? Here is why.

Is there any supporting evidence of the Hunnic Empire occupying Siberian lands? Some people think that there might be some.
Time frames provided on the image below are obviously narrative compliant ones.


The above "Point #1" is right about where the city of Tobolsk is. What else do we know about the city of Tobolsk?

On the below map, we can see where Sibir (10 miles from Tobolks), the capital of Tartars used to be at.


We know that Attila made it to right about here. If he really did hang out somewhere in the vicinity of Sibir/Tobolsk, than his empire was a bit bigger than we were told.


This is probably an appropriate moment to introduce Noah into the picture.


Translated by @Silveryou in here: ...roughly "Here Noah, prince of the Tartars and imperator (in the litteral sense of highest commander/general) of 600 armed men (not completely sure about the word preceding 600, therefore the meaning could be different), commands and moves (in the sense that this is his territory)"
  • edit: not "imperator" but "imperat", therefore he "commands upon" and not "the imperator of"... maybe
Noah is also present on plate 3 of the below 1516 Map.
  • Lat: Hic dominatur et ambulat contra persos Noy princeps tartarorum et imperator super sexingenta [milia added by hand] armatorum virorum qui omnes prouincias tam Cristianorum quam Saracenorum a capite persie usque ad Syriam sue ditioni subiungavat.
  • Eng: Here rules and marches against the Persians Noah, prince of the Tartars and commander of 60,000 soldiers who has brought under his control all of the countries, both Christian and Saracen, from the top of Persia to Syria.
  • Noah (lived 600 years before the Flood, and 350 after the Flood)

On the plate 3, we also have Batu Khan:
  • Lat: Hic ambulat et dominatur Bathot Magni imperatoris Cham princeps maximus de Casana et imperator super sexingenta [sic] .m. armatorum virorum tam christianorum quam Saracenorum qui cum exercitu suo tempore Estiuali super ripam fluminis ad montes ascendit, tempero uero hyemali ad mare descendit.
  • Eng: Here Batu lives as a nomad and rules, the greatest prince of Casana [and descendant] of the great emperor Chan, and commander of sixty thousand soldiers, both Christians and Saracens, who with his army ascends over the riverbank to the mountains in the summer, but in the winter descends to the sea.
  • Batu Khan (c. 1205–1255)
    • Batu or Baatu, better known today as Batu Khan of the Golden Horde, was son of Jochi, and thus a grandson of Genghis Khan.

On plate 4 of the same 1516 Map we can see Gog Khan.
  • Lat: Magnus Tartarum Gog Chaam Rex regum et dominus dominantium.
  • Eng: The great Tartar Gog Khan, king of kings and lord of lords.
  • Question: Who was Gog Khan (or Hun)
Gog Khan.jpg

Note: Translation for the above 1516 map was obtained here. Not surprisingly, they claim that Noy does not mean Noah.

Noah's Family Tree

The below info was dismissed by the narrative compilers as total BS, which means we could be on the right track. Sources are:

The below passage suggests that Ninus was Nimrod's grandson. We may, or may not need this detail later.


That's a big a*s empire I've never heard of... what about you?



I don't know if any of the above was of any assistance leading the reader to Attila the Hun, but there you go.



This "empire fell apart" story reminded me of the Alexander the Great narrative.
  • Additionally, there is a situation, where we have approximately 2300-2500 year gap between Nimrod and Attila. Chances are, this is how devious historical lies are.
  • I did not try to track down two sons of Attila, neither did I try to figure out which one of the Nimrod's nephews could be Attila. This article is getting long as it is, and I'm not even close to being done.
Hun = Khan?
I think we were fed a bunch of phantom empires here, where the Hunnic Empire and the Golden Horde Empire are one and the same. I wouldn't be surprised if quite a few other "empires" would fall into the same "phantom" category. Let's take a look...

The Hunnic Empire (370 AD - 459 AD): ~ 89 years
  • No one knows exactly where the Huns came from.
  • Some scholars believe they originated from the nomad Xiongnu people.
  • Other historians believe the Huns originated from Kazakhstan, or elsewhere in Asia.
  • Prior to the 4th century, the Huns traveled in small groups led by chieftains and had no known individual king or leader.
  • They arrived in southeastern Europe around 370 A.D. and conquered one territory after another for over 70 years.
  • By 459, the Hun Empire had collapsed, and many Huns assimilated into the civilizations they’d once dominated.
  • Source
This is like pretty BS: came from nowhere, and disappeared into nowhere.
  • This is like super convenient for them controllers, "No Body, No Crime".
Let's take a look at a narrative compliant map of the Hunnic Empire.


Empire of Alexander the Great (336 BC - 323 BC): ~13 years
  • He succeeded his father King Philip II to the throne at the age of 20 .
  • By the age of thirty, he had created one of the largest empires in history, stretching from Greece to northwestern India.
  • He was undefeated in battle and is widely considered to be one of history's most successful military commanders.
  • Several factors caused the sudden collapse of the Empire that Alexander built. These include:
    • the early and the somewhat unexpected death of the great king,
    • absence of a capable successor,
    • rebellious generals,
    • the size of the territories Alexander had invaded
Sounds like a military fairy tale with an end similar to that of the Hunnic Empire. It's almost like Alexander knew not to invade areas the Hunnic Empire was gonna invade 700 years later.


The Golden Horde (1242 AD – 1502 AD): ~260 years
  • The Golden Horde was originally a Mongol and later Turkicized khanate established in the 13th century and originating as the northwestern sector of the Mongol Empire.
    • At his death in 1227, Genghis Khan divided the Mongol Empire amongst his four sons as appanages, but the Empire remained united under the supreme khan.
  • With the fragmentation of the Mongol Empire after 1259 it became a functionally separate khanate.
  • You'd have to read the narrative, because it's rather creative.
The size is deceiving, because the Golden Horde was a part of a much bigger Mongol Empire.


The Mongol Empire (1206–1368): ~162 years
  • The Mongol Empire of the 13th and 14th centuries was the largest contiguous land empire in history and the second largest empire by landmass, second only to the British Empire.
  • The Mongol Empire emerged from the unification of several nomadic tribes in the Mongol homeland under the leadership of Genghis Khan (c. 1162–1227), whom a council proclaimed as the ruler of all Mongols in 1206.
  • The empire began to split due to wars over succession, as the grandchildren of Genghis Khan disputed whether the royal line should follow from his son and initial heir Ögedei or from one of his other sons, such as Tolui, Chagatai, or Jochi.
  • Source

The Ottoman Empire (1299–1922): ~623
  • At its peak in the 1500s, the Ottoman Empire was one of the biggest military and economic powers in the world.
  • The empire controlled its territory with a powerful military, lucrative commerce, and impressive achievements in fields ranging from architecture to astronomy.
  • But it didn’t last. Though the Ottoman Empire persisted for 600 years, it succumbed to what most historians describe as a long, slow decline, despite efforts to modernize.
  • What caused the once awe-inspiring Ottoman Empire collapse? Historians aren’t in complete agreement.

The Timurid Empire (1370-1507): ~137
  • The empire was founded by Timur (also known as Tamerlane), who established the empire between 1370 and his death in 1405.
  • He envisioned himself as the great restorer of the Mongol Empire of Genghis Khan, regarded himself as Genghis's heir.
  • The power of Timurids declined rapidly during the second half of the 15th century, largely due to the Timurid tradition of partitioning the empire.
  • By 1500, the divided and wartorn Timurid Empire had lost control of most of its territory.

An Opinion: I think the below map is indictive of a common denominator. Whether Tartary, Scythia, or whatever other name it might have had.

1754 Map


We can picture it this way too... may be.


East vs. West
- everything most likely comes down to this -
  • I will try to elaborate on the maps portion of the article in the overall summary.

Rurik vs. Beala
I finally made it to what I actually wanted to talk about. So, we have this issue, where we are faced with an example of a major historical inconsistency. Here is what we have in every contemporary textbook:
  • Russia has no history prior to 862 AD. The ancestors of modern Russians are the Slavic tribes, whose original home is thought by some scholars to have been the wooded areas of the Pinsk Marshes, one of the largest wetlands in Europe.
  • The rest of the BS mambo jumbo is see here.
Pinsk Marshes.jpg

The establishment of the first East Slavic states in the 9th century coincided with the arrival of Varangians, the Vikings who ventured along the waterways extending from the eastern Baltic to the Black and Caspian Seas.
  • According to the Primary Chronicle, a Varangian from the Rus' people, named Rurik, was elected ruler of Novgorod in 862.
This "Primary Chronicle" has the same issue all other pre-1400s documents do.
  • Tradition long regarded the original compilation as the work of a monk named Nestor (c. 1056 – c. 1114); hence scholars spoke of Nestor's Chronicle or of Nestor's manuscript.
    • His compilation has not survived.
  • Because the original of the chronicle as well as the earliest known copies are lost, it is difficult to establish the original content of the chronicle.
  • The two main sources for the chronicle's text as it is known presently are the Laurentian Codex and the Hypatian Codex.
  • The Laurentian Codex was compiled in what are today Russian lands by the Nizhegorod monk Laurentius for the Prince Dmitry Konstantinovich in 1377.
  • The Hypatian Codex dates to the 15th century. It was written in what are today Ukrainian lands and incorporates much information from the lost 12th-century Kievan Chronicle and 13th-century Galician-Volhynian Chronicle.
    • Galician Volhynian Chronicle was discovered in 1809 by the Russian historian and opinion writer Nikolay Karamzin as a final part of the 15th century Hypatian Codex.
    • Kievan Chronicle is known from a single copy in the 15th-century Hypatian Codex, where it is sandwiched between the Primary Chronicle and the Galician–Volhynian Chronicle.
These comic books do look cool though.


Conclusion: Rurik was the one who started an organized state. To a certain degree, he was the founder of Russia.
  • That is per the narrative.
The Narrative: The only information about Rurik is contained in the 12th-century Primary Chronicle written by one Nestor, which states that Chuds, Eastern Slavs, Merias, Veses, and Krivichs "drove the Varangians back beyond the sea, refused to pay them tribute, and set out to govern themselves".
  • Afterwards the tribes started fighting each other and decided to invite the Varangians, led by Rurik, to reestablish order.
  • Rurik came in 860–862 along with his brothers Sineus and Truvor and a large retinue.
Question: Where did the current narrative lose the fourth brother Variuus?


1591 Source

- The 4 -
I've been saying for a long time that in our field of research, patterns are everything. Every single book, no matter how old it is, was pre-printed or pre-written with an incorporated set of lies. In this case we have four individuals establishing or continuing countries and empires.

  • 1 - Assyrius
  • 2 - Medus
  • 3 - Moscus
  • 4 - Magog
  • 1 - Trubor
  • 2 - Rurico
  • 3 - Sinees
  • 4 - Variuus
  • 1 - Kio
  • 2 - Scieko
  • 3 - Choranus
  • 4 - Libeda
The Empire of Alexander the Great
The Mongol Empire
There gotta be more, methinks...
  • Four kingdoms of Daniel: The four kingdoms of Daniel are four kingdoms which, according to the Book of Daniel, precede the "end-times" and the "Kingdom of God".
The Rurik Issue
Let's see what various texts have to say in reference to what house or dynasty the Russian royalty used to belong to. We are supposed to see Rurik for the surname. Here is straight out of wikipedia. I've included Hungary, because this is how I got into this entire mess.

Now look at the image below. Ignore the "cruelty" portion. The PTB started orchestrating their narrative a very long time ago. Fortunately for us, at some point in time they could not switch last names because it would have been too obvious.
  • Who is Ivan Vasilyevich Beala?

From the book it is obvious that the ruler at hand is Ivan (the 4th) Vasilyevich Ririk aka Ivan the Terribe (1530-1584). That is per the current narrative.

Note: From here on Beala = Béla due to the way this name can also be spelled.


The only Turk of such significance out there (imho) is Mehmed the Conqueror (1432-1481)

Per the narrative, there are four kings named Bela in the House of Árpád.
Note: All four of these Béla's belong to the Arpad dynasty. Nowhere in the todays narrative do we see the Béla dynasty.


The Árpád Dynasty
The Árpáds were the ruling dynasty of the Principality of Hungary in the 9th and 10th centuries and of the Kingdom of Hungary from 1000 to 1301. The dynasty was named after Grand Prince Árpád who was the head of the Hungarian tribal federation during the conquest of the Carpathian Basin, c. 895.
  • It is also referred to as the Turul dynasty, but rarely.
  • Both the first Grand Prince of the Hungarians Álmos and the first king of Hungary Saint Stephen were members of the dynasty.
  • Seven members of the dynasty were canonized or beatified by the Roman Catholic Church;
    • therefore, since the 13th century the dynasty has often been referred to as the "Kindred of the Holy Kings".
    • Two Árpáds were recognized as Saints by the Eastern Orthodox Church.
  • The dynasty came to end in 1301 with the death of King Andrew III of Hungary, while the last member of the House of Árpád, Andrew's daughter, Blessed Elizabeth of Töss, died in 1336 or 1338.

The Turul Dynasty

As it says above, the Arpad Dynasty was also referred to as the Turul Dynasty. The Turul is a mythological bird of prey, mostly depicted as a hawk or falcon, in Turkish tradition and Hungarian traditions. It is a national symbol of Hungarians. The name "Turul" is probably based on bla-bla-bla...
I don't know how old our English language is, but this bird's name sure sounds like "To Rule". Anyways...


It is also said that the mythic bird, the Turul, is the original bird of the original Hungarians, the Magyars, who migrated out of the plains of Central Asia. The legend says that in 896 AD, the bird dropped its sword in what is now modern day Budapest, indicating to the Magyars that the area was to be their homeland.
Note: And how about them little coincidences...




Source - 1581 Source - 1664 Source

Toruk Makto
Apologies, could not help it. A Toruk Makto is a Na'vi individual who successfully manages to ride a great leonopteryx (Na'vi name: toruk). There had only been five Toruk Maktos prior to Jake Sully, and they are spoken of with great respect and honour.

Árpád (c. 845 - c. 907)
Árpád was the head of the confederation of the Magyar tribes at the turn of the 9th and 10th centuries. He might have been either the sacred ruler or kende of the Hungarians, or their military leader or gyula, although most details of his life are debated by historians, because different sources contain contradictory information.

  • Despite this, many Hungarians refer to him as the "founder of our country", and Árpád's preeminent role in the Hungarian conquest of the Carpathian Basin has been emphasized by some later chronicles.
  • The dynasty descending from Árpád ruled the Kingdom of Hungary until 1301.
Rurik (c. 830 - 879)
Rurik, according to the 12th-century Primary Chronicle, was a Varangian chieftain of the Rus' who in the year 862 gained control of Ladoga, and built Novgorod in the same year. This legendary figure was considered by later rulers to be the founder of the Rurik dynasty, which ruled the Kievan Rus' and its successor states, including the Kingdom of Ruthenia, the Principality of Tver, Grand Duchy of Vladimir, the Grand Duchy of Moscow, the Novgorod Republic and the Tsardom of Russia, until the 17th century.


  • The only information about Rurik is contained in the 12th-century Primary Chronicle written by one Nestor.
    • The credability of this "Primary" chronicle was covered above.
  • Source
The Rurik Dynasty
The Rurik dynasty, or Rurikids was a dynasty founded by the Varangian prince Rurik, who established himself in Novgorod around the year AD 862. The Rurikids were the ruling dynasty of Kievan Rus' before it was finally disintegrated in the mid-13th century, as well as the successor Rus' principalities and Rus' prince republics of Novgorod, Pskov, Vladimir-Suzdal, Ryazan, Smolensk, Galicia-Volhynia (after 1199), Chernigov, and the Grand Duchy of Moscow (from 1263).
  • The Romanovych branch of the dynasty ruled central and western Rus'. These territories were unified by Roman the Great and his son Danylo, who was later crowned king of Galicia–Volhynia.
    • This Roman the Great and Danilo (some Daniel?) are uber interesting. Anything "Roman" should be scrutinized, especially when on paper these "Romanovich" people have nothing to do with the dynasty of Romanoffs.
  • After the line's extinction, the kingdom was absorbed by Poland and Lithuania, and the title of its king eventually passed to the ruler of Austro-Hungary.
  • Continuous Rurikid sovereignty from the ninth century to the fourteenth represents part of Ukraine's historical process.
  • In Ukrainian historiography, Rus' civilization - sometimes called Ukraine-Rus' - is not considered to have ended in 1240, but merely to have shifted its centre slightly westward.
As a ruling dynasty, the Rurik dynasty held its own in some parts of Rus' for a total of twenty-one generations in male-line succession, from Rurik (died 879) to Feodor I of Russia (died 1598), a period of more than 700 years. They are one of Europe's oldest royal houses.

Ivan III of Russia

Ivan III Vasilyevich (1440 -1505), also known as Ivan the Great, was a Grand Prince of Moscow and Grand Prince of all Rus'. Ivan served as the co-ruler and regent for his blind father Vasily II from the mid-1450s before he officially ascended the throne in 1462.
  • He tripled the territory of his state, ended the dominance of the Mongols/Tatars over Russia, renovated the Moscow Kremlin, introduced a new legal codex and laid the foundations of the Russian state.
  • His 1480 victory over the Great Horde is cited as the restoration of Russian independence 240 years after the fall of Kiev to Mongols' invasion.
  • Ivan was the first Russian ruler to style himself "tsar", albeit not as an official title. Through marriage to Sofia Paleologue, he made the double-headed eagle Russia's coat of arms and adopted the idea of Moscow as Third Rome.
  • His 43-year reign was one of the longest in Russian history, second only to that of his grandson Ivan IV (The Terrible).
  • Ivan III of Russia - The Rurik Dynasty - (1440 -1505)
Important: If Ivan the 3rd really said this, it should turn the entire historical narrative of Russia upside down.
In semi-normal English: That their ancestors came not of the Russe nation, Ivan III Vasilyevich father to this Emperor - Vasily III (1479-1533) - would many times boast disdaining (as should seem) to have his progeny derived from the Russe blood. As namely to an Englishman his goldsmith, that have received bullion of him to make certain plate: whom the Emperor commanded to look well to his weight. For my Russes (said be) are thieves all. Whereat the workman looking upon the Emperor, began to smile.
  • The Emperor (Ivan III of Russia) being of quick concept, charged him to tell him what he smiled at.
  • If your Majesty will pardon me (quote the goldsmith) I will tell you.
  • Your highness said that Russes were all thieves, and forgot in the mean while that yourself was a Russe.
  • I thought so (quote the Emperor) but was deceived.
  • For I am no Russe, my ancestors were Germans, for so they account for the Hungarians to be part of the German nation, though they indeed come from the Huns, that invaded those countries and rested in those parts of Pannonia, now called Hungary.
The below excerpt could (probably) also explain why Russia was being run (for so long) by the Holstein-Gottorp Dynasty.

In simple terms... Ivan III of Russia stated that his ancestors were Huns.

Note: A particular attention should be paid to the "Blind" issue:

Which one of the Bela Kings was the blind one? This one was:
Conclusion: The name of the dynasty of Russian tsars aka czars comes from this Bela II of Hungary, This is what the above paragraph clearly states. It is also obvious that Huns were the ancestors of Ivan II of Russia, per his own claim.
Empires and Individuals
I do start to think that historical doubles, triples and possibly quadruples are probably more numerous than we could possibly imagine. I doubt that we have gazillions of different "never lost a battle" / "scourge of God" / same area covering people. I think we might a few multiplied into a "legion". In the end, we get thousands years of history. Thousands years of history we do not really have. Some of these doubles do not share the exact same biography, most are separated by hundreds and thousands of years, but all of them do contribute to the overall lies we are faced with.
  • Then Jesus asked him, “What is your name?” “My name is Legion,” he replied, “ for we are many."
For more info on historical doubles you should probably look up Mr. Fomenko. These are the most obvious ones I notices while compiling this article.
"Horned" ones were always serious conquerors and warriors:
Events fall into the same category:
Though Attila does throw somewhat of a monkey wrench into the framework. Why does he have the double-headed eagle (or Turul) there?



When did Attila become a Roman emperor?
  • Ten roundels with bust-length portraits of Roman Emperors, with Augustus on the top flanked by plants and fruits, and three rows of three roundels, each with the sitter's name on a small tablet below the image; illustration to Weigel's 'Sculptura historiarum et temporum memoratrix' (1679).
  • Source


Note: I think these are the prototypes for our historical doubles. Different Peter the Greats, Arpads, Bealas, Tamerlanes, Alexander the Greats and Ivan the Terribles were just phantom copies of the above presented individuals (or individuals similar to them).

Additional Links & Info:

KD Summary: To be honest, this stuff is beyond my ability to process information. I think I am able to grasp the concept. At the same time, to systemically analyze the situation we are in, that would probably require a faculty. Here are a few final points I'd like to make. These are just my thoughts:
  • I suspect a much shorter time line of the known history. I understand that it sounds a bit insane, but we have what we have.
  • I start to think that 400s, 1400s,1600s and 1800s possibly cover the same events. These events are outfitted with different names and uniforms, but they nevertheless are the same events. That is in my developing humble opinion.
  • ~1870s is probably where we can start looking for the beginning of our "known" times... but then we run into SF 1906 and SF 1915.
View of Campo Vaccino in Rome_1_1.jpg
  • I do think that the Bible was written after approximately year 1400 AD on the common timeline.
  • Jesus Christ is not a person. It's "Jesus Events" that we call Jesus Christ,
  • "Jesus Events" happened at least twice. The first one was accompanied by Water, the second one by Fire.
  • Timing of these "Jesus Events" is hidden in the rotating celestial bodies. That would be different Zodiac circles.
  • Peter the Great is not a real name, or if it is a real name, it belonged to someone else.
  • Google Ngram is one of the best research tools we have, and we need to use it more often.
  • All printed historical books contain lies. It's even worth with the handwritten text materials.
  • It's been East vs. West, for a relatively short period of time.
    • Was it Tartary olim Scythia representing the East?
  • Or... was it Controllers vs the survivors of various Jesus Events?
A couple thoughts, perhaps wild and ephemeral:

1. The Terracotta warriors may very well be fake. I had never thought about this until this morning -- although archeological forgeries were/are widely if quietly recognized by sinologists. Nonetheless, this source probably jumps the shark when it notes:

We must have just gotten it into our heads that the site was a pit of sculpted stone soldiers and just got carried away with ourselves,” Kangmin defended, “we were all very young back in 1972 and we took a lot of acid, so I guess we just kind of created the Terracotta Soldiers ourselves without knowing it.

Everyone knows that people were hysterical with Maoism in the early 70s. But the historical project then was to Destroy the Four Olds (破四舊); maybe the students wanted (under the direction of the party) to forge history in their own image (an army of identicals in service of their earthly Chairman/Emperor), but I doubt they had LSD. But then again... I've never asked. Certainly, by 1990 or so, the new historical project was to construct, find, and uncover a great ethno-national history.

2. My favorite Vasilyevich is Vasily Vasilyevich Smyslov, world chess champion-- 1957-58. Reading this article this morning and seeing this story on Chess24, I wonder if the Candidates Match against Garry Kasparov in 1984 wasn't a kind of ritual (staged, possibly), whereby the world championship (The Grandmaster of all chess Grandmasters) is handed via force from a nearly elderly Vasilyevich (Slov/Slav) to, well, a goldfmith (арик Кимович Вайнштейн). No harm meant here. (If Garry reads this: Please know I know your games very well; you also turned me onto New Earth and, yes, Fomenko). Nonetheless, is it possible that this match was without such significance to the PTB?

It is though beating down the "olds" is a thing that never gets old for the PTB.
Last edited:
Goodness, KD, how do you find the time (pun intended?).

I still need a lot more time to review all of this, just wanted to throw this out there on the topic of forgeries, as I stumbled across it a few days ago:
Pseudo-Isidore is the conventional name for the unknown Carolingian-era author (or authors) behind an extensive corpus of influential forgeries. Pseudo-Isidore's main object was to provide accused bishops with an array of legal protections amounting to de facto immunity from trial and conviction; to secure episcopal autonomy within the diocese; and to defend the integrity of church property. The forgeries accomplished this goal, in part, by aiming to expand the legal jurisdiction of the Bishop of Rome...

...During the Middle Ages, few doubted the authenticity of the alleged papal letters. This changed during the fifteenth century, when humanist Latin scholars such as Cardinal Nicholas of Cusa noticed bizarre anachronisms (such as the claim that Clement I had based the preeminence of local churches on the presence of pagan high priests). During the sixteenth century, Protestant ecclesiastical historians such as the Centuriators of Magdeburg (the authors of the Magdeburg Centuries) systematically criticized the forgeries without yet recognizing them as an interconnected complex.
So, as with many things, it's only the conventional paradigm which makes certain documents suspect. The anachronisms cannot possibly be an accurate accounts because it doesn't fit into the approved timeline.
If you want to learn all the BS about AD and BC, here is your link.
That's a pretty fun article. This is a fairly eye-opening quote:
“The hinge idea, that there’s before Jesus and after Jesus really only takes root in the 17th and 18th century,” Hunt says.
Even in just terms of BC/AD, that's a pretty odd statement to make right? If you were allegedly counting from Jesus's birth for a thousandish years before that, how could the concept of time before Jesus take so long to ferment?
I don't mean to provoke you into another (at least not this weekend...) exhaustive, superlative study, but can you expand on your thoughts a bit on the above comment?
Sure. That’s just a hypothesis for the moment. It will sound bananas for some, but opinions might change with time.

Immortal Titans are locked up in the proverbial Tartar. What off limits areas do we have? Antarctica, Area-51, the Arctic region, you pick.

Demi-gods are dead, and that is the main war they are hiding from us. All these prominent known names we get, like Attila, Nimrod, Genghis Khan, Timur Tamerlane, Pugatchev, etc. (all these names probably pertain to the same individual we do not know), various kings and queens, their highnesses, these were demi-gods as well as their children were too. The nobility, so to speak... The indoctrinated tech of Industrial Revolutions was theirs.

And then there were us, mere mortals. We are the slave type... smaller, weaker, dumber... just the way it was genetically designed.
Then something happened, and this smth is what they are hiding. Was it the war of Gods? Could be, methinks.

The enclosed system we live in, requires maintenance, but based on the 10 years we are given due to the so-called Global Warming, we prob don’t know how to conduct it.

And the main thing I guess would be this:
  • 1770-1915 is where all our answers are.
  • The “ancient” civilization of bigger individuals is pre-1770, imho.
  • The time line is screwed up beyond belief.
Events to scrutinize:
  • Napoleonic Wars
  • That’s where our Attilas, Genghis Khans, Mehmed IIs, Timurs, Pugachevs and some other individuals are at. They are one and the same... an idea I’m currently entertaining.
  • The Victorian age (1837-1901)
  • Fall of Constantinople
Though Attila does throw somewhat of a monkey wrench into the framework. Why does he have the double-headed eagle (or Turul) there?
This sort of plays into the point that I find myself compelled to make over and over again. It seems reasonable to me that in addition to outright lies (which come from countless PTB over centuries) to shape the narrative for some unknown agenda, we also have the likelihood of at least one (I know KD is leaning towards two Jesus events, which I can see the argument, but I need to personally dig deeper) major, world-impacting cataclysm event (or smaller events spread out over a relatively small duration) which effectively could have "reset" our knowledge to near zero. And then there time after the event(s) where many sought to retrieve fragments of the lost knowledge, perhaps even in an honest attempt to "enlighten" humanity (heh, like stolenhistory I suppose...). So, we have actual confusion with lost information combined with deliberate lies, and given this situation, I find it incredibly unlikely that any historical correlations will end up completely "perfect." Symbols are going to be muddled, names rearranged for strange one-off situations that we can't even conceive (and as possibly as mundane as some monk making a "typo" )...

And I'm only describing the period prior to the 19th century-ish (corresponding with the change from "f" to "s" typeface, for whatever that's worth). I think the "modern era" is a whole other kettle of fish.
1770-1915 is where all our answers are
I think that's where our current timeline really started to gain cohesion, which I don't even feel is a particularly controversial statement, even in the mainstream... It's just the degree of reorganization that's severely understated. I fear that clear answers going back further than that may be lost to ignorance (from literal lack of remaining information) and malice. However, understanding how the current accepted chronology was accepted might reveal further truths... as KD has said repeatedly, the 19th century until about WW1 is a very strange period of time but maybe not so out of reach that we could eventually gain a greater insight into the mechanisms that created our current reality.

Nothing is clear here at all, but I think KD's "hypothesis" is probably correct in large brushstrokes. Basically, that at one point, human beings were not the only "intelligent" species roaming the Earth (which again, the mainstream concedes, but throws it so far back into the past that it's removed from general consideration). It seems reasonable based on various creation stories from all across the realm that one of these species was our progenitor and at one point, something major happened to mostly eliminate these species from the current world... some combination of cataclysm (natural or artificial), great war, mass exodus, etc.
It appears that the basics of the so-called ancient Greek mythology could be the concept of the answers we’re looking for.
Or "Roman mythology" ... I wonder what actually came first. I enjoyed the passage snipped in the OP that equated Nimrod to Saturn... with Saturn of course being the Roman analog to Cronus, who for quick review:
KRONOS (Cronus) was the King of the Titanes and the god of time, in particular time when viewed as a destructive, all-devouring force.

He ruled the cosmos during the Golden Age after castrating and deposing his father Ouranos (Uranus, Sky)
Nimrod also being described in Genesis 10:8–12 as “the first on earth to be a mighty man. He was a mighty hunter before the Lord.”

The two characters have obvious connections to divinity and have attributed conflicts with God/the gods. But what I really can't help but thinking about is the Tower of Babel story (which the name and association to Nimrod coming not from the Bible, but Josephus) and the alleged splitting of the languages, in combination with the literal meaning of the word "Cronus" being "time" ...

Again, in broad strokes, it appears that someone powerful, perhaps not entirely human but at the very least "special", challenged the old God/gods/powers that be, and chaos ensued. You can literally draw comparisons to countless other myths/religious accounts on this theme (I mean, Genesis itself has several, from Adam and Eve onward).

I suppose one could argue it's all just an allegory for the struggle of the haves versus the have-nots, but there's really no reason to discount the more fantastical elements, given that we have substantial circumstantial evidence that it might not all be fiction, from historical accounts to what modern technology shows us is actually possible. Basically, things like engineered hybrids may have sounded nuts even forty years ago, but now it seems like a real possibility in the near future that you could become a mer-person or bird-dude, not to mention all the other things that might have seemed obviously impossible (powered flight? Computers? Radio?) while the current accepted timeline was getting ironed out.
Last edited:
Repeating cycles instead of a consecutive progression could be the answer. That coild only be possible if we had a shepherd.
Whoever kills the dragon is a civilization slayer? Just thinking out loud...

It's from this monument thread, but it's present there too.


We are living in a “black hole” that crystallizes matter 3 Dimensionally.

Sanctioned by The Creator per Gen. 3:24 - The Flaming Sword i.e. Lucifer, Samael, Satan, The Adversary, Angel of Death, Demigurge, etc.




Auroa Borealis are caused by solar winds disrupting Earths magnetosphere. These “solar winds are caused by Milky Way center black hole Sagittarius*A emitting radio jet streams pointing directly at Earth. Black holes are wormholes. Black holes aren’t actually black but are very bright. Ultraviolet purple in color. That light phenomena at the “northern and southern”poles is Lucifer being cast down to earth for kings to behold i.e conscious/subconscious pattern of thought toward hierarchical power-wealth-mystery knowledge.
  • The Angel of His Presence has authority over the Angel of Death.

A “black hole” is a collapsed star.
Etymology of collapse = to fall.

Stars are conscious by the way. a nutshell.
Immortal Titans are locked up in the proverbial Tartar.
I forgot to mention that 1960s' Star Trek hit this theme. Who Mourns for Adonais?" (1967)

The Phoenician sailors (Kirk, McCoy, Scotty) and their pal, Spock, outwitted the gods and destroyed their temples with Reagans, I mean ray-guns (or plasma discharge weapons).
Last edited:
“Whoever kills the dragon is a civilization slayer? Just thinking out loud...”

The dragon was conflated with the serpent (wyrm). The dragon of antiquity had represented wisdom in the sum of the the four elements that made
the earth and man.

The symbol of St. George slaying the “dragon” has roots in Ancient Aeria (Egypt) with Horus slaying the crocodile with spear. Crocodile representing Typhon who was conflated with Shem whom was responsible for slaying (inverted to martyrdom) Nimrod. George = Girgis = Gengis Khan = Nebuchnazzenr whom was given the title “king of kings” ie just like Jesus-Hausus.

The dragon in their eyes were the People From The Book living in the Holy Land of the Americas worshiping in idolatry.

history was rewritten from the perspective of the enemies of the children of YSRL. Justifying the People’s captivity and the worship of man as a god through corporate means.


Pretty apparent at what this is declaring. Indio= dark

Ezekiel 17:1-10
1 And the word of the LORD came unto me, saying,
2 Son of man, put forth a riddle, and speak a parable unto the house of Israel;
3 And say, Thus saith the Lord GOD; A eagle with great wings, longwinged, full of feathers, which had divers colours, came unto Lebanon, and took the highest branch of the cedar:
4 He cropped off the top of his young twigs, and carried it into a land of traffick; he set it in a city of merchants.
5 He took also of the seed of the land, and planted it in a fruitful field; he placed it by great waters, and set it as a willow tree.
6 And it grew, and became a spreading vine of low stature, whose branches turned toward him, and the roots thereof were under him: so it became a vine, and brought forth branches, and shot forth sprigs.
7 There was also another great eagle with great wings and many feathers: and, behold, this vine did bend her roots toward him, and shot forth her branches toward him, that he might water it by the furrows of her plantation.
8 It was planted in a good soil by great waters, that it might bring forth branches, and that it might bear fruit, that it might be a goodly vine.
9 Say thou, Thus saith the Lord GOD; Shall it prosper? shall he not pull up the roots thereof, and cut off the fruit thereof, that it wither? it shall wither in all the leaves of her spring, even without great power or many people to pluck it up by the roots thereof.
10 Yea, behold, being planted, shall it prosper? shall it not utterly wither, when the east wind toucheth it? it shall wither in the furrows where it grew.

Ezekiel 17:11-13
11 Moreover the word of the LORD came unto me, saying,
12 Say now to the rebellious house, Know ye not what these things mean? tell them, Behold, the king of Babylon is come to Jerusalem, and hath taken the king thereof, and the princes thereof, and led them with him to Babylon;
13 And hath taken of the king's seed, and made a covenant with him, and hath taken an oath of him: he hath also taken the mighty of the land:

CHam=Sumerian= Sumo-Aryan = Indo-European

Some one from a while back on the old site had translated a couple portions from the book, Gilb. Genebrardi theologi Parisiensis, divinarvm Hebraicarvmqve literarvm professoris regii Chronographiæ Libri quatuor ... Emendatum, adauctum etiam, & collocupletatum cum appendice ad A.D. M.DC. Iubilæum maximum & sæcularem

The translations essentially said that the Ancient Hebrew “probably” originated in the West Indies and lost/defeated in the Orient.

I went and translated the pages myself and screenshot it a year ago, but I have to scroll through thousands to find it. Hopefully someone else on here remembers it.
First of all; I'm by this extended account of happenings that you have written!

ΙΧΘΥΣ (fish) and the fish sign is the godess of fertility Athargatis

The wheel is obvious taken from the pagan Wheel

The wheel represents the eternity (I am beginning and end, alfa and omega) because it never stops: every year the crops grow again, the lambs and chickens (easter lambs and eggs) get born, food is abundant in summer, then we harvest, time of no grow and to contemplate (winter) remember the lost ones (Halloween) and at the winter solstice ("birth of Jesus Lamb of god") the Sun wil come back and it will all begin again, in the early spring they turn the soil for the seeds (carnaval, when the world is upside down and the rich landowners are the peasants and the peasants are in charge and everything in the soil is still hidden - masks) and we have to wait for the crops (fasting periode after carnaval) and everything will grow again and so the wheel of the earth spins.

So yes, the fertility godess is very important in this one, and still in many countries in Europe they perform fertility rites.

I found this Photo
And I was like wait... What? Who?
Why would a 400AD guy hide in Constantinopel for non-existent Russians?
And I found a few other things.
First of all Ieso Christo.

I found this Guy
who made a study of Roman writings +/- 300AD

This is supposed to be the founding of Constantinopel named after himself in Latin:

Nam Constantinus proprii cum conderet urbem nominis et primus Romano in nomine regum christicolam gereret, divinum mente recepit consilium, ut quoniam Romanae moenibus urbis,aemula magnificis strueret tunc moenia coeptis,his quoque Romuleam sequeretur dotibus urbem,ut sua apostolicis muniret moenia laetus corporibus.

My Google translate says Christicolam gereret as :
"Christ worshippers"
but if I divide all the words it comes to
Christ Atoined one
Colam : "likewise"
Gereret: "campaign "

I do notice the lack of capital letters for Christ too.

I translate it as: I establish the city of Constantinopel like the followers of the same atoined ones.

I'm wandering here from the official translation.

When I Google or translate Ieso ("Jesus')
I get to:
Translated as: *Teaching authority
* Jesuits. Established 1534 as a branch of the Roman catholic church.

We all know (i hope?) how the catholic church adapted the pagan religion and shoveled into a sort of Christianity with easter, birth of Jesus etc. because they were otherwise seen as pagans? During reformation?

Jesuits and how they tried to stir Europe are a story apart but everytime I see this 500 / j500 /i500 similarities.

And what a coincidence:
Reformation, Calvin, religious wars, the whole shabang begun around i500 / j500
And even more: America was "discovered" just before that.

Ok, so they (the new Americans?) sent us Napoleon, Hitler, they bombed our ages old trading and Hanze cities, libraries, churches, Dresden and now they are even not bothered to shoot an airplane with people out of the air and blame Russia for It

Did they also send the war on religion ?

Here in Europe they say that TPB want Europe in a constant war and instability. For whatever reason.
Money I guess?
Peter the Great is not a real name, or if it is a real name, it belonged to someone else.
I do think that Peter the great did exist.
But this Nicolaas Witsen drew already a
for him when he was not even tsar yet, according to the official story he was then just 15 years old.
So eiter they are shoveling false history into his account or something else is going on.

I was really surprised that tsar Nicholas opened the Peace Palace in the Hague.

Off course the story got mingled and now all the credits go to America and mr Carnegie and according to the Wikipedia the Russia gave us a .... Vase. Yes. A Vase

On the official Dutch site
there is more information.
I will not elaborate too much about the strange history of this Palace, but there are discrepancies.

Why am I so insisting on the Dutch- Russian relationship?
Because it was huge and ages old, it was something with Hanze cities and it brought wealth and people liked the Russians.
And they shovel it under the carpet.
And I think it is the key why the history of Europe had to be demolished.
Big time.
Because Russia ruled.

In the 1650's (or j650) they built the Dam Palace for vague reasons
and it looks pretty Russian I think.

Perhaps the story is not:
Peter the great built St Petersburg as a mirror of Amsterdam but:
Amsterdam was created in the image of St Petersburg.
What was already there, or at least the knowledge how to build advanced cities like st Petersburg was there.

Because the whole city of Amsterdam is documented but most of it is only from 1600-1700 or so.
So they assume that the Canal Houses were constructed around 1600 because documents go so far.
But to me it seems as if they were already there and people just bought them.

I have this old book about Amsterdam and it says:

"Already since the 12th century or so Amsterdam is famous for its trade (I always wonder how? And with whom? Since Holland was one big empty swamp?And why Amsterdam in the swamp?) and suddenly there was absolute silence, nobody wrote about Amsterdam anymore up until the 17t century"

Amsterdam used to be a star fort too. It's buried.
They say its mostly demolished but I don't think so.
History had to be rewritten in a quite neutral place I guess?
That's why we got Scaliger and co.
'the scaler'

They probably just stole him from the roman Empire and placed him in Leiden to write books.
That's why he wrote in Latin instead of Dutch.
Also the alleged founding "fathers" of America the Pilgrims came from Leiden.
It's all just too much coincidence.

The USA created themselve as the new Empire over Europe and Russia and the world and all had to be destroyed.
They sent the communists and killed the tsar, they sent Hitler and Stalin.

I am not sure how other Europeans feel but I feel bothered by the agressive 'dictatorship' that USA puts on us.
Off course our state propaganda tells us otherwise.

They destabilize the whole European continent with creating all these wars and (muslim) refugees that overflow Europe and they keep the whole continent of Africa poor, they push agressive trading agreements in their favor and force embargo's with countrys that ar out of American favor, they force us to withdraw from Russian gas and our own gas supply is running out, so now our nice country gets filled with these terrible and ugly windmills and they demolish ages old forests for the so called sustainable "biomassa centrales" and I heard in Germany it is not much better.

The big money elite (black rock etc) demolish our small companies, they buy all the houses and real estates and rent them for high prices and push us into a shallow Netflix and McDonald's kind of society, they demolish our pensionfunds and banking systeem so people think are smart and invest their money into ETF's owned by those American investment elite and they call it all
"Zzzze great reset".

I think this idea already started with the "world fairs".
The reset for a consumer profit world for a few rich instead of a sustainable world.

The world power of USA is declining because they seemed to have overlooked the Chinese and perhaps they are already building a proxy army of orks (or giants?) in Antarctica and bombard us now with aliens and UFO's because then we will believe it is an alien invasion.
And the Americans will conquer these, off course.

I think the dark ages did not exist, they made up munbo jumbo; we all had to worship in the j500 the new American

G Gold
O Oil
D Dollars

Whatever there was in the form of (free?) energy, they created a new form of slavery in the form of the American GOD and the hunger for GOD with all these "new" inventions like cars and airplanes and central heating and light bulbs and amusement parks.

Perhaps everything in the previous European and maybe even in previous American empire things were almost free and people lived happy and in prosperity because suddenly (when did it start?) they invented owning property and state loans and banks and all.

Maybe they even raided children from the old world, like Russia, Poland, Germany and placed them in USA (like the orphan trains). Maybe the Russian cities were so empty because their people were just stolen from it. And perhaps they stole their knowledge too.

According to my 1800's book about Russia and the Netherlands everybody liked the Russians.
They were nice open minded people with religious freedom and friendly trading skills.
Not at all that bunch of backwards people that they say they were.

Basically everything that "Democratic" America say they are, but in reality they are not, were the Russians.

And off course I don't mean random Americans but the elite.

And no, I don't think there was a particular "Jesus event" exept maybe that America was discovered and suddenly things happend in Europe.
I even go so far that Jesus is the false flag.

Perhaps an event has taken place but at the same time j500 the establishment of the earthy living Jesus and the reformation and enlightment (to get rid of magic beliefs) people now will not buy it. They need science. We now live in the era of science.
Whatever that is.
First of all may I offer a huge thank you for your time, effort and passion that for me is clear in this piece of work.

For me and I guess most that visit the SH forums it both confirms and validates what our instincts have been screaming at us since the fires of curiosity were set alight.

Now all we need to do is figure whether or not the catas-trophies are a natural and cyclic phenomena or is it the over enthusiastic use of a technology that has since the last cataclysm slowly been revealed back to us.
Or "Roman mythology" ... I wonder what actually came first. I enjoyed the passage snipped in the OP that equated Nimrod to Saturn... with Saturn of course being the Roman analog to Cronus, who for quick review:
But ancient Greek was pagan, Roman's to Christian, so nimrod was definitely the Roman's Saturn, but from what I have found, oldest things related to Nimrod are thousands of years after ancient Greece, so would say Greeks then the way anyone ever notice the 2 always fighting politician factions in ancient Greece were red vs blue?
We are living in a “black hole” that crystallizes matter 3 Dimensionally.
Yes and yes.

Hawking sort of said that black holes retained information, what information we may never know, but maybe life is how it presents itself.

As far as missing time, years, almost makes sense if 1000 years are made up, there is so little information 0-999 vs 1000-2000, and yes, I know, things get lost with time.

Took this in Florida, strange how the I and 1's are easily distinguishable, and how new the sign is.

On the subject of Chronology I think it might be helpful to try and create and understand different qualitative general models that can be used along side attempts to understand the quantitive values of chronologies.

A qualitative general model (ie narrative) may appear like this:

In the early era of man there appeared along side the common man a race of spectacular beings that bestowed much knowledge upon man. Initially these being were benevolent, but by some quality of exposure to man or by their prolong experience here with man...these beings fell from their virtue; then overtime their descendants (and the superior features of the original race(s)) faded into the generations to come.

Almost all sciences, philosophy, medicine, architecture of ornate stone and organic geometry was made in this first pre-corrupted time period. In their likeness but lessening stature and potential, their descendants gradually transitioned to war as a means of survival and profit once the innate gifts and intellectual superiority weakened to great extent. This warring way... was very effective since all the known lands had time to develop into sophisticated civilizations and knowledges of different crafts and goods could be found in different localities all over the place—thus it was profitable to begin hoarding and raiding and living off the taxation of these once great any many dispersed places.

A period of disaster, caused by one of these great cultures, ended this descent into madness and left the common man we know today in the ruins of those old great civilizations past—what remained of any superior generation was disconnected from their roots (knowledge) and so long as they resembled the stature and likeness of the common man, they were left to sort out own way. Following these events we have men living in old buildings, lots of trading, period of the Medieval, shipping and exploration and lots of ‘cargo cult’ happening. Rise and spread of Many cultures like the Arab and Chinese, new languages and traces of the old ideas still dimly aware. People plagiarized themselves in the likeness of those images left around and adopted names and stories to suit their ventures and establish credibility in their air (heir) of authority.

Since there remained at least one descendant group, ie. the destroyers of those who fell to far into depravity, there still existed in some trace and portion the great knowledges of those spectacular beings. The conservative approach would be taken by this remaining group: ie gradually implement technologies at a society or country scale and continually adjust and prune the effective from the ineffective.

The foundry period of bricks, great machines of steam (trains, cars, etc), and basic mechanism-like weapons (rifles/guns) was the culmination of one of these periods. Ultimately, something wasn’t too well anticipated...that was the mixture of two implemented systems: economy based social systems and fail-proof/long lasting machinery. This wicked problem could find no resolution in this period and ultimately another (albeit softer) ‘reset’ or intervention was in order.

The periods we know as the civil war, rise of communism, great world wars, modernism, and into the post-modern era as we are in now describe the gradual shift in technology and culture that was needed to respond to the aforementioned wicked problem. The destructions of buildings belonging to the original spectacular beings was as much an expedient for creating commerce and industry (ie through building anew) as it was intentional for covering the tracts and conundrums a clever-minded individual might notice in the consistency of his culture (ie people here at SH). Ultimately, the reason for all the movement of people, modern war, and destruction was to replace and update the first ‘attempt’ at ‘culturing’ with a new idea that addressed some major irreconcilable issues. Ergo gas and planned obsolescence, creating more demand by including in production the ‘life cycle’ of a product.

Well that’s an example there of a qualitative picture of time. Now the tricky part in this scenario is differentiated each culture to each specific era:

1. Original Civilization and Mankind
  • Greek style. What this form calls ‘Tartarian structure’, bastion/star fort.
  • Apex of all knowledge of life on earth, beings of superior stature and intellect alongside typical humans. Era of the Gods. Images of Gods as perfectly looking humans/huge stature beautiful beings
2. Descent of Original Civilization
  • ‘Roman’ empires/Khan hoards and like narratives. Historical traumas left imprinted in our subconscious memory of terrible stories and historic figures. Major mixing of races advanced and by comparison primitive occurs. Movements of peoples. The unrest that arises after the peak of original circulation.
3. Destruction of Original Civilization, will to power
  • Flood story, KD’s articles on ancient weapons, fires, North African scar, weapons on the Gods/Fasces, etc.
  • One of these superior beings or group of beings digest all the others who’ve strayed to far from virtue. Ie maintain the wisdom but disperse the presence by annihilation or removing the culture foundations from what ever offspring remained.
4. Rise of Mankind, standing on the shoulders of giants.
  • cargo cults
  • Rise of religions in the absence of all-powerful rulers of old
  • Mankind either makes basic structure or Mimics works of old (medieval vs Byzantium culture). Contrast of glorious cathedrals and castles of the old world with the wooden shacks of the confused peasants and serfs world wide.
  • KD’s posts on apocalypse art
5. Foundry Rise and Peak (ie First attempt to re-introduce old knowledge).
  • steam era, trains, blimps, perfect machines, bricks, ships, electric technology
6. Failure of the Modern (foundry) infrastructure, and beginning of reset via war and ‘tabula rasa’ of many remnant cities of old.
  • warships, tanks, bombs, fictional historical figures that act as a symbol of patriotism to get behind, beginning to use newsprint to direct the affairs and attitudes of man.
  • European countries and many ancient remnants in America obliterated.
  • Moving of massive populations of children of wealthy elite to displace peoples sense of history: NY orphan trains, Operation Peter Pan (Cuba), lots of Europeans to Canada, etc.
  • First major memory trick played out on humans, since the initial catastrophe was moreso about the war of the Gods, and the regular human was more or less an ant in the shadow of those events.
7. The post-modern Era
  • you are here, what a strange place we find ourselves now.
Now given those seven time frames and all the stories we know of history along side their proposed dates... can we collage things to match? I don’t intend this to be a ‘fixing the evidence to match the theory’ so much as a thought experiment to gauge where in the timeline the excess time was added or how can we begin to understand a sensible structure for the flow of events.
KD, wow...amazing. I must have read this 5 times and I'm still trying to process it all.

Do you mind explaining what you mean by this statement?- "...based on the 10 years we are given due to the so-called Global Warming..."

Thank you for all your diligent research.