it has been written!
in corr ect ly
Aug Mental Tellezit like IT IS:
in corr ect ly
Aug Mental Tellezit like IT IS:
Gosh you've moved me to tears, thank you. I made a decision early in my life not to bring anymore people into this world. And I had the remarkable good fortune to meet and marry a man who felt the same way.You are a really cool and kind human being. I enjoy all your posts. If you have kids and grandkids, they are lucky to have you.
Post automatically merged:
I posted this on another thread the other day:
Every time I see the word alien now, I read it as a lien.
lien - a right to keep possession of property belonging to another person until a debt owed by that person is discharged.
Perhaps those who encounter aliens are being reminded that they are on loan from another place.
I'm not sure I agree with that premise. It sounds a bit like Nietzsche: "What is the truth but a lie agreed upon?".I was not trying to be rude. To honor your question the one who asks is both. A forewarning of deception makes it no less deception, if that is what you are getting at; but honestly I have no clue what you're getting at.
Yes, I do claim truth is collective. Truth is defined as a fact or belief that has been accepted. How can one's beliefs be accepted when there is none to accept it?
And it's whispered that soon, if we all call the tune,
Then the piper will lead us to reason.
And a new day will dawn for those who stand long,
And the forests will echo with laughter.
I started the vid, but didn't have time to get too far, but I'm interested, I'm able to lucid dream occasionally and I have thoughts about what if we make our own reality after we die, ok wishful thinking, but just to be on the safe side I try not to visualize myself rotting in a box forever, when instead I could be out horseback riding on the great plains. Although I don't hold out much hope.certainly is a great thread. the deep end of the SH pool ;-)
anyway, has anyone watched that last vid I posted with Aug Tellez? rings true or not? thats some major octaviousness. lol
I like how these riddles work the best when the usual "italics" are removed around the words. Its kind of like a sleight of word. Expand that concept. What italics (and where) would the "Creator" have removed to deflect our attention to prevent understanding of his "intentions". Assuming that he did remove almost all of the italics should we zoom in or out? Missing mountains for the trees or trees for the mountains?What occurs twice in a moment;
Once in a minute,
and never in a billion years?
That is a very astute observation... This seems to be the way this realm works. Our attentions are intentionally diverted. So much so that even when the answer is given in the question, we can't see it since we have been trained to think otherwise.I like how these riddles work the best when the usual "italics" are removed around the words. Its kind of like a sleight of word. Expand that concept. What italics (and where) would the "Creator" have removed to deflect our attention to prevent understanding of his "intentions". Assuming that he did remove almost all of the italics should we zoom in or out? Missing mountains for the trees or trees for the mountains?
It seems to me when trying to explain things, the more words we use the further we move from the truth.same here for the most part until I realized the truth is within. tag, youre it!
we cant write the truth exactly as it is because we are that truth ('know thyself') so we can only write quasi-truth quasi | Origin and meaning of quasi by Online Etymology Dictionary
Know thyself - Wikipedia
― Lao Tzu
we can define reality (authorize it) or we can sub scribe to others definitions of it (hisssstree)
only? I experience otherwise but also the power of the collective, Ive already written my thoughts about this somewhere on here, I learned it the hard way and its also the same way TPTB operate (polarizing the collective to do their bidding) however, we as individuals have our own collection to work with and I am witness to the law of attraction in miraculous ways way beyond impossible.
thats also when I read the thread title and that author 'eliminating the impossible', I lol'd. Im certainly no master of miracles but Ive learned enough to know that anything is possible.
what are you on about tupperaware?
that riddle is easy when its written, not as much when spoken.
freestyle writing has its place I guess but with a strict adherence to the 'styles' [syntax] italicized fonts break the flow of the text. (corrupting it in some cases) watch out for it in contracts, and also anything encased in four corners [brackets] or other 4 corners.
didnt you say(write) that you were a coder tupperaware? this is The manual for the English Code
there is also this The Chicago Manual of Style, 17th Edition
which is more useful in some ways depending on the usage of the code.
That is a very astute observation... This seems to be the way this realm works. Our attentions are intentionally diverted. So much so that even when the answer is given in the question, we can't see it since we have been trained to think otherwise.
For example, we are told that the stones in the pyramids were carved. I knew that didn't make sense, but my mind could not break free of that prison until I watched Wise Up's vids. It was a water shed moment for me when he pointed out they were poured, like concrete. A ha!
The answer was right in front of me, but I had been blinded to it.
By faith Enoch was translated that he should not see death; and was not found, because God had translated him: for before his translation he had this testimony, that he pleased God.
@ first i wanted to try and answer the “what are we missing) q?- Sir Arthur Conan Doyle (or so we are told)
We have established we did not land on the moon. Countries do not exist. We cannot agree on the shape of this realm. Hell, we don't even know if human beings took a shit a century ago.
So, I gotta ask, what is it we're missing? We assume people were here a hundred years ago, and yet, we can't prove it. There are only hand-me-down stories and easily-falsified artifacts.
It seems we can only disprove the official narrative. We have dismembered all assumptions we have taken for granted. I feel as though we are tiptoeing around a big pink elephant. What is it we are scared of asking ourselves?
Proof of your "craziest" ideas are welcomed, but these days, proof is hard to come by, so I will settle for a well-thought-out synopsis.
So i started to read with a selective eye(ignoring all the fighting, and going trough all the impossible’s )I'll do a proper response to the real question of the thread - which seems to be "what do we not want to ask ourselves" - once I've had a bit of sleep. It's been a long day
Maybe it is a game......and a damn serieuz oneThe principle quandary appears to be "why, as an infinite, unbounded potential, am I restricting myself to this temporary form?"
there are no cheat sheets, we can't share and compare answers, we can't go to school to learn the suitable reply to this very simple question: "what am I, and what am I doing here?"
To bring this back to more mundane considerations: I don't think anyone is pulling the wool over our eyes - or even trying to. Even if they were, they would be wool-blind themselves. But I do believe that there is a "trick" at work, even something so simple as the "peekaboo" game we play on young babies. The issue is that it's a trick we're playing on ourselves. Will I remove the wool from my own eyes, and see what actually is?
the 100th mon key effect only applies to the collective and the collective seems to be waiting on a savoir. seems to be a lead or follow situation.Maybe it is a game......and a damn serieuz one
Where in; we can cheat the other, aslong as you wish to believe
It all has to do with believe right....aslong as one wishes to believe in darwin, what may give one an excuse to fool the other
I don’t think is has to do with you or me, cause whatever you do, you will always be influenced by others(life is motion)
So it has to be done by all of us, untill a socalled tipping point
we are the truth, and the lie IMOI really believe that the truth will not be found, untill the liar/s admits the lie
I think ego is a liar/adversary, yes. I also think ego is AI and that everything it thinks it 'knows' came from where? so why keep serving it also?The only thing i can do is ask the right questions
(Fellow liar)Don’t you think so
I always say that i only trust in god, and about other people; i have faith/believe in you’ll(one day we may all be)what about faith? before we decide to trust/believe, we must have faith, right?
No; i don’t think that the ego thinks, i just feed the level of it’s addiction/habbit(the thing that i think to feel )I think ego is a liar/adversary, yes. I also think ego is AI and that everything it thinks it 'knows' came from where? so why keep serving it also?
|Thread starter||Similar threads||Forum||Replies||Date|
|Pope is a Liar: #6 The Impossible Map of Pirro Ligorio||Ancient Rome = Holy Roman Empire||6|
|Impossible Vorontsov Palace, Crimea||Building Investigation||9|
|H||Forget Sumeria. It's impossible to decipher an unknown language||Etymology and Languages||83|
|The impossible 1587 Urbano Monte's World Map||Geographical Transformations and Maps||26|
|The impossible colossal "King Bath Tub" - who really produced this monster?||Technology||28|