Mudfossil University: Titans, Giants, Dragons...

Messages
1,402
Likes
2,290
#1
Was just wondering what the general opinion is on the work being done by Roger from the Mudfossil University.

He takes those huge giant looking statues/rock formations, and finds traces of human organs and bones inside of what seems to be rocks. He claims strictly scientific approach, and apparently was able to extract DNA from the solidified blood cells. He says the DNA is preserved by a blood coagulant.



600 mile long dragon in Sahara
He went as far as claiming that the ridge looking formation is indeed a 600 mile (or something like that) long dragon. There is definitely resemblence there. He makes a lot of interesting points pertaining to that dragon. The totality of coincidences comes up to a ridiculous amount. But could there be a 600 mile long dragon though?


Roger claims that his desert dragon is holding the Eye of Sahara in her claw. He determined that the dragon was a female by the shape of her tail.

Coincidentally there is a samurai sword depicting a similar image on its blade.

minamoto sword_1.jpeg

minamoto sword.jpeg


Any opinions?
 
Messages
149
Likes
135
#2
Lol I know him, sometimes listen to him for fantasy ideas for my story.

Unfortunately, so many of this is rather out there and I'll need lots of evidence for such titans and enormous animals making up our Earth. Besides, if they were to be true, it would contradict almost everything that we are talking about right now. But it is quite amazing to think that Earth is nothing but piles of dead bodies lol.
 
Messages
149
Likes
135
#5
Messages
143
Likes
233
#6
i can't figure Roger out. he seems to know the right words, all the right terminology. almost too much for some wacko with a YouTube channel. however this one time, i did go out to my backyard and picked up a random "lung" or "liver" looking rock. i'll be damned if it didn't have the blow out hole and the tendon marks. i giggled. and i still have the rock somewhere.

Wise Up, he's another weirdo. half the time he consistently makes me feel like i missed some video he did "way back" and he "won't go over it again" because i dunno, he seems cranky as shit. and he's just showing some weird rock and is convincing me it's rebar. he's lost on me...
 
Messages
53
Likes
132
#11
Are you saying that if those are indeed the giants, they could have gotten petrified for preservation purposes?
More or less yes.
If the technology exists to turn flesh to stone, we have a precedent for the statues.
For the rocks, who knows? Could be that all rocks are alive at a very slow rate.

Not too concerned with giants. If you throw out Newton's gravity and think in terms of buoyancy, giant humans easily exist in a thicker atmosphere. Just like whales exist today in water. Stretching here, but a water dense atmosphere is good source for a deluge.

I watched Roger's video again on how science treated Velikovsky - this is a pattern often repeated by the establishment.
And came to the conclusion that everything in the age of enlightenment is a lie.
It was named enlightened to control the narrative, if you disagree you are automatically un enlightened.

The first step to discovering the truth is allowing your ego to take the hit and admit everything you think you know is wrong.
 
Messages
591
Likes
301
#13
i don't like him, he also claims know statues are actually petrified giants
also a dragon of that size would probally have its own gravitational field, lol
Post automatically merged:

Lol I know him, sometimes listen to him for fantasy ideas for my story.

Unfortunately, so many of this is rather out there and I'll need lots of evidence for such titans and enormous animals making up our Earth. Besides, if they were to be true, it would contradict almost everything that we are talking about right now. But it is quite amazing to think that Earth is nothing but piles of dead bodies lol.
agree 100% also agree with @ISeenItFirst @Apollyon
 
Messages
241
Likes
248
#14
There's such a thing as portable x-ray machines. Has he tried x-raying them? The DNA he obtains may be contamination and, unless he gets the DNA from INSIDE the rocks, while his case remains compelling, his conclusions are premature and inconclusive.

Could be that all rocks are alive at a very slow rate.
Reminded me of Jesus speaking in Luke 19:40. And he answered and said to them, I tell you that, if these should hold their peace, the stones would immediately cry out.
And the prophet Habakkuk speaking in Hab. 2:11. “The stone shall cry out of the wall, and the beam out of the timber shall answer it.”

Not preaching anything here, just providing documentation that BStankman's concept is not entirely novel or possibly not as far-fetched as it may sound.
 
Top