Giant "Ancient" Romans, Human Engineering and the Real Slavery

KorbenDallas

Negotiator
Messages
3,840
Reactions
14,527
Well, I just wanted to throw this out there for a discussion. For a while now, I have been trying to find a possible explanation for the weird infatuation with the Ancient Roman culture displayed by those who lived in the 19th century. According to the narrative the time distance between the 19th century, and the Ancient Romans was pushing 1,200 - 1,400 years. Yet, we have such recent (relatively) individuals as Napoleon Bonaparte, Peter the Great and George Washington displayed wearing the same Ancient Roman toga attire. Of course, it is explained officially as an artistic style, or vision. But what if style or vision had nothing to do with this. What if we are being misled beyond belief?
  • The toga, a distinctive garment of ancient Rome, was a roughly semicircular cloth, between 12 and 20 feet (3.7 and 6.1 m) in length, draped over the shoulders and around the body. It was usually woven from white wool, and was worn over a tunic. In Roman historical tradition, it is said to have been the favoured dress of Romulus, Rome's founder; it was also thought to have been worn by both sexes, and by the citizen-military. As Roman women gradually adopted the stola, the toga was recognised as formal wear for Roman citizen men.
  • Ancient Rome: 753 BC - 476 AD
Additionally, we need to remember that there was no knowledge of anything ancient prior to approximately 1418, when Poggio Bracciolini discovered the "antiquity". There are multiple other issues to consider, when talking about the antiquity as it relates to the narrative compliant time frames. Below are just some of those.
17-19th centuries.
The below compilation has three well known historical individuals wearing the above mentioned Ancient Roman toga:
  • Peter the Great: 1672-1725
    • Remember, that Peter's last name was ROMANov.
  • George Washington: 1732-1799
  • Napoleon Bonaparte: 1769-1821
toga_compilation.jpg

We had this little discussion about who the blurry figures in the below image were supposed to be prior to being edited out. There was an opinion that the ones on the right side of the photograph were children. In the squared area below I think we could have toga wearing individuals poorly hidden by a low quality editing. The only issue with that would be that it was 1870s.

To discuss the below "toga" photograph, please visit the pertaining thread below:
napoleonstatue_1.jpg

And of course the above collection would not be complete without the below statue of George Washington.

Horatio Greenough Washington.jpg

Obviously, there are more of the "recent" individuals out there, displayed in such a fashion. The above three were used due to their notoriety. Here is a little extra on the issue.
Alexander Suvorov
1730-1800
Suvorov_2_1.jpg

Roman monuments to non-Roman individuals

Ancient Times
Then we obviously have the original toga wearers, those from the so-called ancient times. I will lean towards the size mismatch between "ancient" individuals due to my train of thought racing in this specific direction. The size variation is different. Whether it could be attributed to various time frames, or different versions of the species, I do not know.

Marcus Aurelius at a sacrificial ceremony with the Temple of Jupiter Capitolinus in the background.
800px-Bas_relief_from_Arch_of_Marcus_Aurelius_showing_sacrifice.jpg

I am not going to look for any additional images of the different size ancient humans wearing togas. I know that I have seen a few. You are welcome to add the ones you come across.

I will leave visual presentation of humans/humanoids at that for right now. Simply remember that there is a height/size difference present. For additional reference please see the below link. The individuals there are not Ancient Romans, but I believe the core issue is directly related.
Your Highness/Majesty
I suggest that the below explanation of Highness/Majesty could be incorrect:
  • The forms used when referring in the third person are His Highness (of a man) and Her Highness (of a woman).
  • If the prince or princess is a member of a royal family, the full form is Your Royal Highness; if a member of an imperial family (i.e., the family of an emperor or empress), the form is Your Imperial Highness.
  • The corresponding form for a king, queen, emperor, or empress is Your Majesty.
In my opinion, "Your Highness/Majesty" means a much bigger size of the person referred to by "Your Highness". Meaning the title should be taken literally. As in...

Muzri_30_1_1.jpg


Architecture
A lot has been said about various instances of the Roman-like architecture in the United States. None of these architectural marvels describes the issue we are dealing with better then the World Parthenon phenomena.

The original Parthenon is claimed to be Ancient Greek. At the same time if the Ancient Rome was not what we are told it was, the Ancient Greece, if it ever existed, was something different as well. In my opinion its one and the same.

Anyways, here is the Ancient Greek Parthenon in Athens.
  • Constructed: 447 BC - 432 BC
The_Parthenon_in_Athens.jpg

This here is the Nashville, Tennessee Parthenon.
  • Constructed: 1897 out of horse hair and plaster. Rebuilt into a permanent structure between 1925 and 1931. Allegedly of course.​
Tennessee_Parthenon.jpg

Additionally we have multiple other similar structures. Some were produced almost 2,000 years ago, and some only 100-150 years ago.

The Peter and Paul Cathedral in Sevastopol.
Built in 1840-1842.

peter_and_paul_sebastopol_1.jpg


Same Sebastopol church (above) in the 19th century.
Link 1 - Link 2
Peter and Paul Cathedral in Sevastopol_3.jpg



Madeleine Church, Paris. Built in 1807-1828.
Founded by Napoleon.
madlen_church_france.jpg


Roman Pantheon vs French Pantheon
113 AD vs 1765 AD
Pantheons.jpg


Titus Rome Arch vs. Moscow Arch
82 AD vs 1834 AD
Arch_of_all.jpg

Unrelated Arches Info
KD: My hypothesis for all of the above is summarized via the below bullets.
  • Ancient Greek Parthenon, Roman Pantheon and any "ancient" structure was built at a relatively the same time with the Nashville/Sebastopol Parthenon, and French Pantheon. In other words, the only difference is the condition our TPTB chooses to keep them in.
  • Napoleon, Washington, Peter the Great and their Co. and Marcus Aurelius and his Co. (while traditionally separated by 1,000+ years) belonged to the same spin of civilization, and have to be placed much closer to each other on the time scale. Some of them could possibly exist at the same time.
  • They were the ones called "Your Highness, Majesty" and such due to their superior height, power and abilities.
  • They were the proverbial Giants, on whose shoulders Mr. Newton once stood.
  • They used the doors similar to the one below.
saint-petersburg-russia.jpg

If this guy below was to stand up, he would have walked right through the above door, and its size would have made the perfect sense.

Horatio Greenough Washington.jpg

The upper floor of the Russian Winter Palace was for the serving slaves. The other ones were for the Gods.

mud_flood_3_1.jpg

And those "in the know" have been making fun of us for quite a while now.

giants_republic.jpg


Real Slavery?
I finally made it to the actual purpose of the thread, which made me spend time on everything you see above. Their Highnesss and Majesties, aka The Giants, were the true masters with knowledge and abilities to build all the architecture we still admire today. They also had the knowledge to make us, the humans. I mean exactly that. Just like we make cars, and computers today, they were making us. They were the Gods, and us, the humans, were their slaves. We were made in their likeness, but with multiple developmental shortages.

In one of the recent threads pertaining to the early American Prisons we had the below building: Eastern State Penitentiary.
  • Originally, inmates were housed in cells that could only be accessed by entering through a small exercise yard attached to the back of the prison; only a small portal, just large enough to pass meals, opened onto the cell blocks. This design proved impractical, and in the middle of construction, cells were constructed that allowed prisoners to enter and leave the cell blocks through metal doors that were covered by a heavy wooden door to filter out noise.
Notice the size of the front door, and re-read the bullet above. In my opinion this is the place the Gods used for production of their slaves. Those slaves were us, the humans. The slaves were of all skin colors.

Eastern_State_Penitentiary_aerial_crop.jpg

Additionally we could have been grown in what today is known as Dolmens.

Aristocracy is a form of government that places strength in the hands of a small, privileged ruling class. The term derives from the Greek aristokratia, meaning 'rule of the best-born'. The Gods were the Aristocrats: a class of persons holding exceptional rank and privileges, especially the hereditary nobility.
It appears that some time as late as the mid-19th century some of the Gods were still in existence. Something happened, and humans, aka The Slaves revolted against their masters, and won the Global War. I use the 19th century relying on the traditional time table. Could it be some other time frame? It probably could.

After the war we ended up with multiple cities without population:
Engineered Children
Once the War with Gods was over, the children could still be engineered. In my opinion this is how the below "Orphan Train" issue could be explained.

Official position: During the 1850s there were thousands of children living on the streets of several major cities. The children were in search of food, shelter, and money and sold rags, matches, and newspapers just to survive. The children formed gangs for protection because life on the street was dangerous and they were regularly victimized. The police often arrested the children, some as young as five years old, and put them in lock up facilities with adult criminals. Determined to remedy the situation, the Children’s Aid Society and the New York Foundling Hospital devised a program to take children off of the streets of New York and Boston and place them in homes in the American West rather than allow them to continue to be arrested and taken advantage of on the streets. Because the children were transported by train to their new homes, the term “orphan trains” began being used.
  • The Orphan Train Movement was a supervised welfare program that transported orphaned and homeless children from crowded Eastern cities of the United States to foster homes located largely in rural areas of the Midwest. The orphan trains operated between 1854 and 1929, relocating about 200,000 orphaned, abandoned, abused, or homeless children.
Not sure if this one here could be related, but judging by our abandoned cities, and population numbers in 1850s, may be it could. May be the Gods did keep our numbers under 500 million. Looks like it did not help them too much. On the other hand, may be their numbers were under 500 millions, this is just some food for thought.
Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.jpg

kd_separator.jpg

KD: Anyways, above is my hypothesis on some of the issues we are dealing with. I just scratched the surface of the info pertaining to the topic at hand here. I understand that it sounds crazy enough, but so do some of the narrative compliant versions.

As far as giants go, may be we should start paying closer attention to what we are actually presented with. Some of the paintings could reveal things we were not supposed to know.

 

Maxine

Active member
Messages
118
Reactions
244
I don't like and never hold on to the idea that humanity was engineered as slaves(though i've seen some theories besides this one on it), i think we are something greater than just some Androids alike slaves created to serve higher in height humans! I believe in creation, but i don't believe we were created by somebody from this world, more like out of this world, a God (i don't behold myself to any religion but i'm listening to all of what religions members and their scriptures are saying, cuz' many of that stuff makes actual sense) and weren't created to be slaves!
 
Last edited:

Red Bird

Well-known member
Messages
337
Reactions
767
21874

What about Lincoln? He was tall, a mason, but he ‘freed the slaves’ and bucked the Feds then was assassinated. Perhaps someday some deranged, single person will destroy this statue....they never forget.
 

Timeshifter

Well-known member
Messages
277
Reactions
850
Would love to understand where the Royal Highness Giants disappeared to? Did we kill them all, or did a cataclysm help us? Did the atmosphere change and that enabled us to win out?

Are the continuing 'rulers' genetic offspring of the Giants? Or their once slavers? How did the people who rule now maintain/ gain their stature?

I believe between the great minds here we can begin to paint a clearly picture of our real history, we just need to keep joining the dots.

great thread KD (y)
 

Ice Nine

Well-known member
Messages
711
Reactions
2,956
Something that leapt out of your post for me KD
"Architecture
A lot has been said about various instances of the Roman-like architecture in the United States. None of these architectural marvels describes the issue we are dealing with better then the World Parthenon phenomena.

The original Parthenon is claimed to be Ancient Greek. At the same time if the Ancient Rome was not what we are told it was, the Ancient Greece, if it ever existed, was something different as well. In my opinion its one and the same."
I've said this before, I think ancient Rome and ancient Greece were the same thing. Everything else is so mucked up and confusing too, somewhere along the line Rome/Greece got all jumbled up, one civilization got split into two. Even though the names are not similar everything else about them is the same in my brain.

I do also think we were genetically engineered, at some point a different more advanced race, from another world or an ancient race of Giants works for me just fine too. I never discount the Annunaki theory. It would actually makes things so much easier if it were indeed true.

Giants, no question in my mind. I just can't believe humans our size were building the huge buildings with the huge doors. I like your highness idea as well, sometimes the answers are staring us in the face.

I think something changed on Earth that made it so giants could no longer survive, or they finally got sick and tired of us and went home.
 
Last edited:

HulkSmash

Active member
Messages
70
Reactions
213
What a fantastic thread KD!! I really appreciate your time and effort putting it together. I agree with your position here. It makes me think of the Annunaki. As I have mentioned before, I am a fan of Sitchins work regarding the Annunaki and it is my opinion that a great deal of the information he wrote was true. He stated that the Annunaki WERE the giants of reknown and that they lived amongst us, as well as creating us and showing us how to do everything. They created the Adamic race using Home Sapiens and their own DNA. Check out the differences between Neanderthals and Cro-Magnon. Those kinds of skeletal differences are not possible with evolution alone. They would take millions of years. 'Adam' was the first 'batch'. 'Adam' was a grouping. Same with 'Eve'. They were trying to create a slave race that could think on its own enough to mine, farm, run the machines and solve problems, but not get too headstrong. The 'Eve' batch was more challenging and questioned 'God' and was too smart. This lead to the whole Garden of Eden ( the protected preserve) story. I loved the work of the late Lloyd Pye. He really took the genetic piece of the Annunaki puzzle to compelling lengths. Its my opinion that he was spot on and that is why is all of a sudden became ill with an aggressive cancer that killed him very quickly. The PTB's had to shut him up. Having an archaeology/anthropology scholastic background, giants definitely existed and were real. Its impossible for all the hundreds of skeletal discoveries, across the world, over time, to be a 'giant' hoax. Pardon the pun. All the architecture around the world, and it all seems to have the same style, with large windows, doors, and ceilings, was not created just to be 'artistic' only. Sorry, I don't buy that. Way to much evidence that points to giants being real. I also think that they were here fairly recently also, in fact its my opinion that they never fully left but have been 'watching'. To many stories from natives in regions all over the world that corroborate their existence. I don't think natives, in regions completely separated geographically, were in cahoots with each other. I also think that there were 'factions' within the giants. They were just like we are. They loved, hated, were generous and cruel, and displayed all the myriad of emotions we have. Some believed in freedom, others in slavery. I think this is the beginning of the entire duality paradigm we find ourselves in now. They had it in their society, we have it in ours. Some humans sided with some of the giants they related to, and vice versa.
 

RecycledSoul

Well-known member
Messages
136
Reactions
270
View attachment 21874

What about Lincoln? He was tall, a mason, but he ‘freed the slaves’ and bucked the Feds then was assassinated. Perhaps someday some deranged, single person will destroy this statue....they never forget.
Possibly torn down in a similar fashion/predjudice as the confederate monuments of the south.

Again, His-Story is written by the victors...
 

Prana

Member
Messages
9
Reactions
38
I agree 100% with the idea of being genetically engineered as slaves. We are the only species on earth that defies the laws of nature and I believe we defied our masters and destroyed them. Most people feel that they have no purpose or no sense of belonging and inevitably end up doing jobs that they hate and slave their lives away. It is ingrained into us.

I like the Sumerian story of being formed in the Hall of Amentes by combining nephilim sperm with clay to create humans.

Now, we face the same problems regarding our inventions that will inevitably lead to our own demise.
 

RecycledSoul

Well-known member
Messages
136
Reactions
270
What a fantastic thread KD!! I really appreciate your time and effort putting it together. I agree with your position here. It makes me think of the Annunaki. As I have mentioned before, I am a fan of Sitchins work regarding the Annunaki and it is my opinion that a great deal of the information he wrote was true. He stated that the Annunaki WERE the giants of reknown and that they lived amongst us, as well as creating us and showing us how to do everything. They created the Adamic race using Home Sapiens and their own DNA. Check out the differences between Neanderthals and Cro-Magnon. Those kinds of skeletal differences are not possible with evolution alone. They would take millions of years. 'Adam' was the first 'batch'. 'Adam' was a grouping. Same with 'Eve'. They were trying to create a slave race that could think on its own enough to mine, farm, run the machines and solve problems, but not get too headstrong. The 'Eve' batch was more challenging and questioned 'God' and was too smart. This lead to the whole Garden of Eden ( the protected preserve) story. I loved the work of the late Lloyd Pye. He really took the genetic piece of the Annunaki puzzle to compelling lengths. Its my opinion that he was spot on and that is why is all of a sudden became ill with an aggressive cancer that killed him very quickly. The PTB's had to shut him up. Having an archaeology/anthropology scholastic background, giants definitely existed and were real. Its impossible for all the hundreds of skeletal discoveries, across the world, over time, to be a 'giant' hoax. Pardon the pun. All the architecture around the world, and it all seems to have the same style, with large windows, doors, and ceilings, was not created just to be 'artistic' only. Sorry, I don't buy that. Way to much evidence that points to giants being real. I also think that they were here fairly recently also, in fact its my opinion that they never fully left but have been 'watching'. To many stories from natives in regions all over the world that corroborate their existence. I don't think natives, in regions completely separated geographically, were in cahoots with each other. I also think that there were 'factions' within the giants. They were just like we are. They loved, hated, were generous and cruel, and displayed all the myriad of emotions we have. Some believed in freedom, others in slavery. I think this is the beginning of the entire duality paradigm we find ourselves in now. They had it in their society, we have it in ours. Some humans sided with some of the giants they related to, and vice versa.
Excellent post, Hulksmash. I feel the same, and couldn’t have worded that better.
 

milhaus

Well-known member
Messages
201
Reactions
792
I don't like and never hold on to the idea that humanity was engineered as slaves(though i've seen some theories besides this one on it), i think we are something greater than just some Androids alike slaves created to serve higher in height humans! I believe in creation, but i don't believe we were created by somebody from this world, more like out of this world, a God (i don't behold myself to any religion but i'm listening to all of what religions members and their scriptures are saying, cuz' many of that stuff makes actual sense) and weren't created to be slaves!
I wouldn't worry too much. After reading Gnosticism I figured that if we were made by a lesser god or other beings then we may not have had souls, but the true Creator saw us, was born on earth through a woman when all the right pieces were in play, to live a life perfected as one of us, and to die. Then to overcome the human death.
To complete a process we can't fully understand that gives us an opportunity for eternal life. CS Lewis wrote in Mere Christianity about how the Bible tells us we have the chance to be the adopted children of God. I thought, why do we need to be adopted by the one who made us? I know he had his own explanation but it wasn't connecting for me.

Cloning, however, might be a different problem. But what if humanity was wiped out and the earth became full of spirits? Where have the ghosts gone now? If revelation already happened then were we just left behind? In this scenario, the demiurge was now ruling a haunted planet and decides to try again. The catch is that once his sons recreated humans, after living alone for some time, the lost souls and/or spirits were given another chance which is why everything we know is a lie. They have to fight to keep us since we have a way out and they don't want to be left alone. To counter this, they then create more humans than there are spirits to inhabit them (guidestones), creating NPCs. Even if life isn't what it seems, that's okay because it was that way before we knew. And when we get new information, it is simply another piece of the puzzle to be worked out. I am not suggesting this thought exercise is the truth, though. Only an idea that hopefully will open some new avenues of thought for someone.

KD, I was thinking along similar lines when reading a thread the other week about the 'i' later becoming 1 for the years. I wondered if our ancestors were cloned and put back where things left off, except time had passed on earth while we were away. This might explain why there are still documents and people can trace their genealogy and why it was necessary to recreate the civil war and other events that people remember happening, but actually happened a long time ago. Are they simply recreating the life each of us has already lived through?

The other day I saw the news talking about long lost twins again. You know, the long lost twins that always live a mile or less away from one another in the same type of house, drive the same car, both like all the same things, marry a woman with the same name, etc. How do we know they are twins and one of them isn't a clone?

Anyway, thank you for writing a summary of events from your perspective, which is something I have been waiting for since before I even made an account. Whether it is true or not, you have and continue to open a lot of doors for understanding, which is invaluable.
 

HulkSmash

Active member
Messages
70
Reactions
213
Can someone tell me what the dolmens connection is? Haven’t found anything.
I read a while back that dolmens were places of sacred space. Places that were created to be fractal, life promoting, healing. Bio architecture in a basic, any one can make, form. I think this civilization, which included, if not was created by, the giants, had a much greater understanding of energy and all its forms. In my opinion, I think this tell tale, across the world, style of building, was the mastery of bio architecture. I think that's why there are stories of people living much much longer lives (Methuseluh, etc).
 

ScottFreeman

Well-known member
Messages
117
Reactions
395
What about Lincoln? He was tall, a mason, but he ‘freed the slaves’ and bucked the Feds then was assassinated. Perhaps someday some deranged, single person will destroy this statue....they never forget.
Ya gotta at least do some cursory searches before spouting that...stuff. Lincoln was NOT a Freemason. The more you make generalizations the more wrong you'll likely be. For the record, I AM a Freemason. So were my father and both grandfathers. Only Dad went from 3 to 32 in the York Rite (which is a historical look at masonry). The rest have remained 3rd degree. So, no. I don't have any idea what happens in the sub-organizations or at the top of the pile. What I do know is that everyone I've met through masonry would give the shirt off his back to someone on the street if he thought they needed it. Frankly, I'm TIRED of listening to those who assume, because they know nothing. There may be a huge conspiracy at the top, but that's not what masonry is about for the vast majority of us.

/rant off
 

Red Bird

Well-known member
Messages
337
Reactions
767
Ya gotta at least do some cursory searches before spouting that...stuff. Lincoln was NOT a Freemason. The more you make generalizations the more wrong you'll likely be. For the record, I AM a Freemason. So were my father and both grandfathers. Only Dad went from 3 to 32 in the York Rite (which is a historical look at masonry). The rest have remained 3rd degree. So, no. I don't have any idea what happens in the sub-organizations or at the top of the pile. What I do know is that everyone I've met through masonry would give the shirt off his back to someone on the street if he thought they needed it. Frankly, I'm TIRED of listening to those who assume, because they know nothing. There may be a huge conspiracy at the top, but that's not what masonry is about for the vast majority of us.

/rant off
I did read it, and was somewhat surprised, I think it was in an Edward hendrie book. I don’t think one can become president without having some sort of connection however.
I don’t think all Catholics are in league with the jesuits either and, as a Christian I read a lot of negative stuff. I quit qualifying everything I say and write as in, ‘I’m really not a homophobe, nazi, whatever but....’. I don’t expect you to apologize every time you say you’re a mason either.
 

WarningGuy

Active member
Messages
91
Reactions
197
KD: Anyways, above is my hypothesis on some of the issues we are dealing with. I just scratched the surface of the info pertaining to the topic at hand here. I understand that it sounds crazy enough, but so do some of the narrative compliant versions.
If you think what you are saying might be crazy then check this out.
This one is for the US.
United States of America
This link you can see any country you want. Its interesting to see what countries are spared and what countries are not.
List of Countries 2017
Georgia Guidestones: Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature and Guide to Military Equipment and Civil Aviation have a lot in common.
 

RecycledSoul

Well-known member
Messages
136
Reactions
270
If you think what you are saying might be crazy then check this out.
This one is for the US.
United States of America
This link you can see any country you want. Its interesting to see what countries are spared and what countries are not.
List of Countries 2017
Georgia Guidestones: Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature and Guide to Military Equipment and Civil Aviation have a lot in common.
The statistics on the Deagel website are disturbing. I wonder who maintains it, & where these numbers are derived? The US is to lose 2/3 population in 6 years according to that site. Things that make ya go hmmm.
 

BStankman

Well-known member
Messages
589
Reactions
2,688

What about Lincoln? He was tall, a mason, but he ‘freed the slaves’ and bucked the Feds then was assassinated. Perhaps someday some deranged, single person will destroy this statue....they never forget.
Here is a quote by Lincoln in his memoirs after visiting Niagra falls.

nay, even, when Adam first came from the hand of his Maker---then as now, Niagara was roaring here. The eyes of that species of extinct giants, whose bones fill the mounds of America, have gazed on Niagara, as ours do now.

Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln. Volume 2.
 
OP
KorbenDallas

KorbenDallas

Negotiator
Messages
3,840
Reactions
14,527
Here is a statue of George Canning (1770 – 1827) in London. George Canning was a British Tory statesman who served as Prime Minister of the United Kingdom from April to August 1827. He occupied various senior cabinet positions under numerous prime ministers, before eventually serving himself as Prime Minister for the final four months of his life.

Statue_of_George_Canning,_Parliament_Square,_London.jpg

In 1866 Mr. Canning's statue was overseeing the construction of the Metropolitan District Railway.

Below is the statue of William Pitt the Younger (1759 – 1806) in Cambridge. He was a prominent British Tory statesman of the late-eighteenth and early-nineteenth centuries. He became the youngest UK Prime Minister in 1783 at the age of 24. He left office in 1801, but served as Prime Minister again from 1804 until his death in 1806. He was Chancellor of the Exchequer for most of his time as Prime Minister. He is known as "the Younger" to distinguish him from his father, William Pitt, 1st Earl of Chatham, called William Pitt the Elder or simply "Chatham", who had previously served as Prime Minister.

William_Pitt.jpg
 

Jim Duyer

Well-known member
Messages
133
Reactions
320
I read a while back that dolmens were places of sacred space. Places that were created to be fractal, life promoting, healing. Bio architecture in a basic, any one can make, form. I think this civilization, which included, if not was created by, the giants, had a much greater understanding of energy and all its forms. In my opinion, I think this tell tale, across the world, style of building, was the mastery of bio architecture. I think that's why there are stories of people living much much longer lives (Methuseluh, etc).
Based upon the writings scratched into sandstone that were found inside of many of the Dolmens, especially those in Portugal and Spain, I believe that they were a gathering place for the shamanistic types, which would have been proto-Druidic. Some of the dolmens date to the Cro-Magnon era. One in France was indeed dated to about 15,000 YBP.
 

Top