Communism: The True Story

whitewave

Well-known member
Messages
1,308
Reactions
4,088
Equal in life but not in function. Problems arise when we don't equally value everyone's function. The early Christians advocated a commune-ist lifestyle and it immediately had life-threatening problems (Annanias and Saphira).
Ayn Rand wrote several books about the ideology of socialism/communism and its practical applications. Depressing as hell and she's way too verbose for my tastes but she certainly makes her point and drives it home.
As long as there is continued abundance, people will generally behave themselves and share with others but just the rumor of a suspected shortage of ANYTHING and otherwise decent people instantly turn into greedy, thieving asshats.
 

UnusualBean

Well-known member
Messages
210
Reactions
768
Equal in life but not in function. Problems arise when we don't equally value everyone's function. The early Christians advocated a commune-ist lifestyle and it immediately had life-threatening problems (Annanias and Saphira).
Ayn Rand wrote several books about the ideology of socialism/communism and its practical applications. Depressing as hell and she's way too verbose for my tastes but she certainly makes her point and drives it home.
As long as there is continued abundance, people will generally behave themselves and share with others but just the rumor of a suspected shortage of ANYTHING and otherwise decent people instantly turn into greedy, thieving asshats.
In case you didn't catch it, communism and socialism are not the same thing. They should not be combined into one under any circumstance.
 

asatiger1966

Well-known member
Messages
199
Reactions
891
My opinion, all governments since before castles were used as fortresses, have been purveyors ,purposely, of human suffering. I may jump around with my train of thought, but be kind.
This planet was originally a place of pure energy. Several words are used to describe this force but I like "Love". Experience tells me that several groups of outliers in our universe, have fought for control of earth for longer that we can conceive. The original spirits had to modify their structure to keep pace with the new and different types that were arriving to conquer the planet.

Tens of thousands of years pass and the spirits had changed to a form similar to humans. Every time the sprites became more material they would alter some of the natural accessibility to think and speak creation. We went from instance to using rituals to return the original powers of creation.

Wars have happened over our planet forever. We were aware of that for many years. There are good visitors that try to help the humans regain our spirits and bad visitors that want to use humanity in some manner that benefits them. When the earth is returned to a positive force it helps stabilize the universe.

The communists were controlled by a form of parasite that lives off negative emotions and suffering. Almost all governoments are controlled by these parasites. The emotion Love is a major defense against them. They can be killed with some energy streams, a bullet to the host will work They hate any spiritual activity and will infiltrate and destroy.

All war is on purpose fought for power and to create human suffering. My opinion only.
 

whitewave

Well-known member
Messages
1,308
Reactions
4,088
In case you didn't catch it, communism and socialism are not the same thing. They should not be combined into one under any circumstance.
You might want to explain that to the Russians, a (formerly) communist country. They called themselves the United Soviet SOCIALIST Republic.
 

UnusualBean

Well-known member
Messages
210
Reactions
768
You might want to explain that to the Russians, a (formerly) communist country. They called themselves the United Soviet SOCIALIST Republic.
All part of the plan to confuse people about what socialism actually is and make them reject it in stride with communism. Subjugating people is easy when they do most of the work themselves.
 

Magnus

Well-known member
Messages
103
Reactions
361
Ok, so who are the True Jews? I don't think there are any.
Nobody can claim to be an authentic Hebrew /Jew / Son of the Tribes of Israel.

Why? All the patrilineal records dating back to Adam were destroyed in the razing and destruction of Jerusalem and the Second Temple in 70 A.D.

Since then, nobody can prove they are of the Tribes of Israel *authentically*

They can claim to be of Jew-ish lineage.
 

Magnus

Well-known member
Messages
103
Reactions
361
It was my understanding that "Jewishness" was through the matrilineal line?
Indeed, you are correct and your statement supports my above statement.
Nowadays: Jew-ISH if your mother is Jew-ISH

Hebrew scriptures recorded the father to son lineage... check Genesis for the "begats"

Is it possible to tell the story of Communism without speaking of the Jewish involvement?
 
Last edited:

tupperaware

Well-known member
Messages
199
Reactions
523
By suggestion of @KorbenDallas, I will create a thread all about communism. Now I have my own ideas to it, however, it will go into politics and economics. Which I have enough on my plate already in my Ancap subreddits. So I won't go into it unless there's an interesting comment on this thread.

But for your pleasure, just post anything you would want to know or say about the true origins and motives of communism here!
This Bicameral Mind theory has a lot of major utility for the Stolen History Theory. Basically, the brain structure called the Corpus Callosum currently suppresses the overt influence of the right (feminine?) side of the brain. Pre 500BC?, the elite ruled over groups that were very easy to control and much more sheeplike than most people currently. Propaganda (Epic of Gilgamesh, Old Testament, any list of commandments etc.) was easily soaked up by the right side which would actually talk/whisper to the left, like a hypnotist you just can't get rid of. Below is a good post where the theory is with a little of mine.... that the more the CC is broken down the more the tendency for people to accept Socialism and Communism. The prime motivators of communism may come from a long line of "influencers" that have a group memory of dominating the BC sheep pre 500BC. That control was disrupted by language, cultural and writing influences. Linguistics, Sociology and Literature specialists were not around to find the levers of control and employ them to maintain the status quo. The controllers have longed to return us to the golden age of sheepdom and the path to that is through socialism ending up in many different varieties of communism.

In short, communism was just the way things operated for thousands of years in most city states, pre 500BC. Many like the Cretan state were heavily controlled/influenced by women. Marx failed since he did not have the knowledge to reestablish through any means the injection of control memes into the right side (feminine?) of the brain "and" lower the CC barriers to right over left control. Prediction: It won't be men percentage wise that foster the return of the Bicameral Mind. So what's the benefit (to many) of that return? A safer much less free world of course. Freedom from wars, greed, alpha male dominance, football, Christianity/Islam, the stock market and biggest benefit of all - manspreading.

http://www.julianjaynes.org/jjsforum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=499
Re: Mind Control and Cults by lenny52682
"The relationship between bicameral phenomena and cult/totalitarian phenomena is something that I would like to explore more. There seem to be several points of agreement as well as a few important differences. When examining schizophrenia as a vestige of the bicameral mind, Jaynes was careful to point out that this illness is only a partial relapse into the bicameral mind. The schizophrenic is socialized as a conscious person and, although he hears voices, he does not loose his analog-I.

I would like to suggest that, while schizophrenia represents a partial relapse into the bicameral mind on an individual level, cults and totalitarian societies represent a partial relapse into the bicameral mind at a social level.

Here are some points of agreement that I have been able to discern. The cult leader/ totalitarian ruler is analogous to the steward king. The doctrines of cults and totalitarian regimes are like the mystical world views found in bicameral life. The command economies under communism, fascism, cultism, etc. are analogous to the palatial economies of bicameral society. The pyramidal power structures are shared by both social systems as well. Lastly, both social systems are basically barren of any significant individual volition.

However there are differences as well. Cult members and citizens under totalitarianism are not devoid of consciousness. Their sense of free will is repressed through manipulation and brute force but it still exists. Bicamerals did not possess free will and therefore, were not repressed with propaganda and the threat of violence. Cults are primarily destructive in nature but bicameral society was task-oriented and quite constructive in nature. The first instances of political/religious oppression and rebellion occurred in the breakdown of the bicameral mind. It is interesting that many other instances of repression in the conscious era have been brought about by a partial relapse into bicamerality i.e. totalitarianism and cultism."
 
Last edited:

Tyrion

Active member
Messages
49
Reactions
121
Communism is and always was a plot to destroy civilization. The Soviet Union always depended on the west for it’s survival. American men sacrificed their lives in Normandy, the Ardennes, Market Garden, Montecassino, North Africa... for the survival of Stalin, how can you blame The Zionists when gentiles do their bidding so willingly.
 

whitewave

Well-known member
Messages
1,308
Reactions
4,088
This Bicameral Mind theory has a lot of major utility for the Stolen History Theory. Basically, the brain structure called the Corpus Callosum currently suppresses the overt influence of the right (feminine?) side of the brain. Pre 500BC?, the elite ruled over groups that were very easy to control and much more sheeplike than most people currently. Propaganda (Epic of Gilgamesh, Old Testament, any list of commandments etc.) was easily soaked up by the right side which would actually talk/whisper to the left, like a hypnotist you just can't get rid of.

In short, communism was just the way things operated for thousands of years in most city states, pre 500BC. Many like the Cretan state were heavily controlled/influenced by women. Marx failed since he did not have the knowledge to reestablish through any means the injection of control memes into the right side (feminine?) of the brain "and" lower the CC barriers to right over left control. Prediction: It won't be men percentage wise that foster the return of the Bicameral Mind. So what's the benefit (to many) of that return? A safer much less free world of course. Freedom from wars, greed, alpha male dominance, football, Christianity/Islam, the stock market and biggest benefit of all - manspreading.
Correct me if I've misunderstood your post but it seems to be saying that woman are sheeplike, easily led, schizophrenia-prone and the reason for communism.
Btw, the Cretan society was the pinnacle of civilization in its day. The Greeks, being their natural enemy, made the word "cretan" into the epitaph it is today. At the height of the Cretan civilization, Greeks were the "barbarians".
Have you considered that in a golden age where such societies as Cretes thrived, a communal living arrangement may have been the norm and not the dreaded downfall of freedom it is today? Many words and concepts have changed meaning over time into their diametrical opposites. I'm not saying that's the case, but only that it could have been. We don't know. As with much of stolen history, we just don't know and it denotes a more circumspect way of thinking to consider that things may not have been as we've been told.
 

tupperaware

Well-known member
Messages
199
Reactions
523
Correct me if I've misunderstood your post but it seems to be saying that woman are sheeplike, easily led, schizophrenia-prone and the reason for communism.
Btw, the Cretan society was the pinnacle of civilization in its day. The Greeks, being their natural enemy, made the word "cretan" into the epitaph it is today. At the height of the Cretan civilization, Greeks were the "barbarians".
Have you considered that in a golden age where such societies as Cretes thrived, a communal living arrangement may have been the norm and not the dreaded downfall of freedom it is today? Many words and concepts have changed meaning over time into their diametrical opposites. I'm not saying that's the case, but only that it could have been. We don't know. As with much of stolen history, we just don't know and it denotes a more circumspect way of thinking to consider that things may not have been as we've been told.
Just the opposite.

The right side brain has always been characterized as having many feminine qualities - .
This "oversimplification" is everywhere and very catchy. The latest generations grew up on that definition.

Based on that and the convincing (to me) Julian Jaynes BC theory its easy to make a connection between the increasing focus on these feminine qualities as always positive and some kind of underlying "move" back towards a BC controlled society. It could be just an unstoppable natural progression from male dominated non BC to female dominated BCism. You probably won't find this connection anywhere yet since is sounds sexist. Hyping the right side of the brain as the stronghold of the feminine spirit for around 30 years is major sexism/propaganda if you ask me. But then that is somewhat balanced by the much less advertised left side having nothing but "masculine" qualities. Talk about "divide and conquer"!

Communal living arrangements pre 500BC? according to Jaynes would be characterized as being right brain "directed" societies. Think of mild and stable schizophrenia where the left "get the job done through logic" side listens to the right for guidance on day to day activities. Command and control dictates came from the elite ruling class. It was a time when our conscience did not just make us feel guilty, it was the puppet master.

Its simple - to the degree any society fosters right brain thinking it moves closer to a BC controlled society. The limit of this will be if some kind of drug is created that breaks down that door and totalitarian states require its use - to maintain your good "social" credit score for example.

Its possible that drug is already here and people are enjoying it in part because it breaks down that barrier - maybe ayahuasca/DMT?

You have all heard the phrase "listen to your inner voice". Maybe one day it becomes a state propaganda message.

Here is an interesting connection between BC theory and religion. Perhaps the devil as a creation of Christianity and other religions arose when right brain control became an impediment in some warlike societies and the "voice" as devil was a devious way to distance the ruled from that voice.

The ancient inner voice is not the outer voice of reason.

Welcome... Beings of Light - The Rising Feminine Energy

Heady times ahead.
 
Last edited:

AgentOrange5

Well-known member
Messages
33
Reactions
124
Many like the Cretan state were heavily controlled/influenced by women. Freedom from wars, greed, alpha male dominance, football, Christianity/Islam, the stock market and biggest benefit of all - manspreading.
Why would women want to do away with religion? It's no secret that (at least in the US), church congregations have a higher percentage of female members than male. Many churches have been actively focusing on how to get more male members (with not a lot of success.) Surveys have also shown that women are more likely to be "serious" about Christianity then men (in terms of daily prayer, weekly services, etc.) Most churches are led by men, so I don't see women rejecting the "alpha male" either.

I suspect you have been listening to the MSM feminist ideas, which have little to do with what most women want. Certainly, I think most people, men and women both, want freedom from wars and greed. As for the rest, I haven't heard any woman who wants to do away with any of that, or even complains about that, outside of paid propagandists.
 

Red Bird

Well-known member
Messages
238
Reactions
537
It’s now my belief all goes back to mystery schools which means Babylon and Nimrod and power over the earth as gods, ultimately. Look under every rock and there they are no matter what time period. My interests are how, not who, and their motivations.
 

tupperaware

Well-known member
Messages
199
Reactions
523
Why would women want to do away with religion? It's no secret that (at least in the US), church congregations have a higher percentage of female members than male. Many churches have been actively focusing on how to get more male members (with not a lot of success.) Surveys have also shown that women are more likely to be "serious" about Christianity then men (in terms of daily prayer, weekly services, etc.) Most churches are led by men, so I don't see women rejecting the "alpha male" either.

I suspect you have been listening to the MSM feminist ideas, which have little to do with what most women want. Certainly, I think most people, men and women both, want freedom from wars and greed. As for the rest, I haven't heard any woman who wants to do away with any of that, or even complains about that, outside of paid propagandists.
I was mixing what life might have been like thousands of years ago - pre Christianity, with modern life for a bit of humor.

Reading up about the huge imbalance towards women over men in church. the problem could be that women are disinclined to accept peer level men - preferring their men as alpha and roosting at the top. Those at the top have been modifying their sermons unconsciously to promote that disparity which might be psychologically more beneficial in both directions. Per below its interesting that 40% of breadwinners are now female and they don't seem to be interested in sermons on work. So the unstated theory is that men are interested in hearing about work at church but women are not. Interesting.

"Steve Sonderman offers another possible reason for the decline in male church attendance in an article for Charisma News. Citing a survey from 2013, Sonderman says that 92% of men have never heard a sermon that discussed the topic of work, a subject that would hold meaning and relevance for most men. Although it’s true that the number of female primary breadwinners in America is on the rise, recent data from Pew Research indicates that sixty percent of breadwinners are still male, suggesting that the topic of work would be relevant to the majority of men. Sonderman’s point is that men don’t find sermons to be relevant to their lives. “Most men in our society today do not see the value of going to church,” he says. “It is not speaking their language, and it is not addressing the issues they face.” "

These articles are not going to connect the huge number of church closings across America to this exodus of men from church. Maybe too painful. Sounds like female dominance (60/40 or better) in church life as well as in almost all non technical college curriculum. Should be interesting times ahead since female dominance is growing in areas we have not seen before.
 

SonofaBush

New member
Messages
6
Reactions
7
Please, let us keep in mind the nature of this forum. Straight up politics we most definitely do not need. i.e. good vs bad...
Sounds like that is all I've heard and all from one angle. We don't have communism, we have corporatism, the Dictatorship of the bourgeoisie. I haven't read the article, but Wikiliar probably confuses capitalism and corporatism where the former I am sure rarely has ever existed in current and erased/rewritten human history and then only for a few generations before morphing into corporatism except perhaps in rare cases where communists manage to block this by countering the corporatist propaganda along the lines of Corporatist News Network and the far more extremist Faux News with there own propaganda. Yes the Intelligentsia paid themselves a bit more handsomely than the masses but it wasn't this lopsided. The Soviet Union and China invested heavily in infrastructure making the rise of Chinese corporatism possible, unlike Trumty Dumpty which has only rewarded those who fired Americans making $20/hr with Chinamen making $0.20/hr and probably deducted plant and equipment at something like 40% with bringing those profits back at 25%, buy back stock, and cash out at inflated prices.

I find the attitudes of many of those on the forum toward Jesus' teachings and sink-or-swin cuthroat masculine competition that I doubt throughout history most human males measured up to (even Imperialist Corporatist Germany of the 1930s or the United States of SaudiIsraelia since 1996 when the Neocons took over the Clinton regime) to be quite disturbing. No I am not a feminist which has nothing to do with gender equality, just plain pro-female as the name implies. My bets are the more masculine women become the more masculine males have to be to get a mate. I don't know what feminists mean by "toxic masculinity" since the use of that term and the phrase "man up" is uttered by them in at least nine out of 10 cases. Perhaps that is why Venezuela, Iran, Cuba, Nicaragua, are all on this misadministration's hit list and they can't what to get a regime to their liking any latter than yesterday in all four cases.

Even among lions, temperaments vary and all join in on the feast. There has to be checks and balances. The Wahhabist-Imperialist-Zionist three headed hydra of United States of SaudiIsraelia has none now that 1) arrests of whistleblowers and foreigners on Soviet-style charges are sent to kangaroo courts while war criminals get promoted (Haspel, Abrams, ad nauseam), 2) two forms of political correctness Zionist Neoconservatism and Social Justice Warfare clash, and 3) both mow down the alt-right and alt-left with plenty of additional help from Fakebook and Jewtube.

It was largely that I had a feeling something was not quite right as early as the late 1970s and am aware there is nothing true being parroted by the plastic robots reading a CIA script as far as current events go, so I am more skeptical of even ancient history than ever which lead me to Max Igan / The Crowhouse, Fomenko, and finally here (however long that lasts). AFAIAC you do not have to go past what supposedly happened in the last 24 hours to get a glimpse of history in the process of revisionism by Faux News, MSDNC, etc.

Plenty of subjects for a few dozen threads, mostly stuff about messes so strange I don't really know where to even begin no doubt.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads


Top